Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 7, Cited by 0]

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati

B.V. Bhaskar Reddy vs The Station House Officer on 21 October, 2024

cz,,.

                                                                                      [3365]
                 lN THE HIGH COURT 6F ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATl


                      MONDAY ,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF OCTOBER

                               TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
                                              :PRESENT:
                 THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE DR V R K KRUPA SAGAR                           r'|^   a.i;

                           CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 7251 OF 2024

        Between :
        B.V. Bhaskar Reddy, S/o. B.P. Krishna Reddy, aged about 53 years, Occ-
        President/Corrospondent, SirC.V.Raman Educational Institutions,R/o.               Door

        No.15/1236,      2nd    Road,   sanjeevanagar,    Tadipathri, Ananthapur District.
        Mentioned in FIR C.V Bhaskar reddy

                                                                     Petitioner/Accused-55
        AND

           The Station House Officer, Tadipathri Town Police Station, Ananthapur
           District, rep. by its Public Prosecutor at High Court ofAndhra Pradesh at
           Amaravati.

                                                                  Respondent/Complainant


              Petition under Section 482 of BNSS (438 of Cr.P.C.,) praying that in the

        circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Petition,
        the High Court may be pleased to direct the lst respondent to enlarge the

        petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest jn connection with the case in
        Cr.No.210   of    2024    for   the   alleged   offence    under   sections   147,148,
        506,188,324,427,307 r/w 149 of lPC


              The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the

        affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of SRI G L
        NAGESWAR RAO Advocate for the Petitioner, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for
        the Respondent and the Court made the following
                               Jr,



ORDER

'[Learned counsel on both sides are present. Learned counsel for the petitioner made a few submissions.

In regard to the doubts urged I-n the petI-lion, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor seeks time for instructions.

List the matter after two (o2) weeks. In the meantime, the petitI-Oner iS directed to joI-n the investigation and respondent-state is directed not to take any coercive steps against the petitioner." \ -zfrg/ SD/-U.SRI DEVI` ASSISTANT R TRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION 4oFFICER For.

To,

1. The Station House officer, TadI®Pathri Town Poll-ce Station, Ananthapur Distrl-ct,

2. One CC to SRl. G L NAGESWAR RAO Advocate [opuc]

3. Two CCs to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court ofA.P[OUT]

4. One spare copy J. HIGH COURT DR VRKS,J DATED:21/10/2024 LIST THE MATTER AFTER TWO (02) WEEKS ORDER CRLP.No.7251 of 2024 DIRECTION