Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 12]

Himachal Pradesh High Court

The Kangra Central Cooperative Bank vs The State Of Himachal Pradesh & Ors on 13 December, 2016

Author: Sandeep Sharma

Bench: Sandeep Sharma

    IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
                                            CWP No. 956 of 2011.
                                    Date of Decision: 13.12.2016.




                                                                     .
    _______________________________________________________
                                             [





    The Kangra Central Cooperative Bank                              ......Petitioner.
                                    Versus





    The State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors.                        ....Respondents.

    Coram




                                           of
    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge.
    Whether approved for reporting1?
    For the petitioner:             Mr. Ranjan Sharma, Advocate.
    For the respondents:
                   rt               Mr. Ramesh Thakur, Deputy Advocate
                                    General, for respondents No. 1 and 2.
                                    Ms. Chetna Thakur, Advocate vice

                                    counsel, for respondent No.3.


    Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral)

Learned counsel representing the petitioner has made available communication received from the General Manager of the Bank intimating therein that all the officers promoted from Officer Grade-I to Assistant General Manager in the said DPC held on 29.3.2008, have been retired from their services as AGM and on the higher posts of DGM and GM, and as such, with the aforesaid subsequent development, present petition has become infructuous. The aforesaid communication has been taken on record.

Whether reporters of the Local papers are allowed to see the judgment? Yes.

::: Downloaded on - 15/04/2017 21:43:53 :::HCHP -2-

2. Accordingly, in view of aforesaid position and on the basis of instructions imparted to the learned counsel for the .

petitioner by his client, this petition is dismissed as having become infructuous with liberty reserved to the petitioner-Bank to approach the appropriate court of law in case need arises.






    13th December, 2016                      (Sandeep Sharma),




                                     of
    manjit                                       Judge.


                 rt









                                          ::: Downloaded on - 15/04/2017 21:43:53 :::HCHP