Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Child In Conflict With Law Xyz vs State Of Maharashtra And Anr on 12 October, 2022

Author: Sarang V. Kotwal

Bench: Sarang V. Kotwal

                                                 1/2            18-IA-842-22-IN-APEAL-257-22.odt

                                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                       CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                      INTERIM APPLICATION NO.842 OF 2022
                                                      IN
                                        CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.257 OF 2022

                       Child in conflict with law XYZ                   .... Applicant

                                     versus

                       State of Maharashtra & Anr.                      .... Respondents
                                                        .......

                       •     Mr. Irfan A. Shaikh, Advocate for Applicant.
                       •     Mr. S. R. Agarkar, APP for the State/Respondent No.1.
                       •     Ms. Devyani Kulkarni (Appointed Advocate) for Respondent
                             No.2.

                                                CORAM      : SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.
                                                DATE       : 12th OCTOBER, 2022

                       P.C. :


1. In this matter, the State has filed the Appeal i.e. Criminal Appeal (ST) No.16578 of 2022 for enhancement of sentence along with condonation of delay application.

2. The State has sought enhancement of the sentence to Digitally signed by MANUSHREE MANUSHREE V the maximum sentence, which is life imprisonment, according to V NESARIKAR NESARIKAR Date:

2022.10.14 14:32:17 +0530 learned APP Mr. Agarkar.
Nesarikar 2/2 18-IA-842-22-IN-APEAL-257-22.odt

3. Considering this, even this matter will have to be placed before the Division Bench because the Appeal preferred by the State is concerning the same subject matter.

4. Therefore office to take steps to tag the present matter with the Criminal Appeal preferred by the State of Maharashtra and to take further steps to place both these matters before the Division Bench.

(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)