Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 5]

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Commissioner Comarcial Tax vs M/S Goyal Senetari Stors on 8 January, 2018

  Common Conditional Orders in the matters relating to
      Serial Nos. 1001 to 1007 as per cause list

Gwalior, dated: 08.01.2018
         The Court proposes to pass this common conditional
order to obviate passing of identical conditional order in these
matters involving similar office objection/default :
         In all these matters, due to non-removal of office
objection within the prescribed time as per the Rules, the
concerned matter was placed before the Registrar in the first
instance. The Registrar granted sufficient time to the
petitioner(s) applicant(s)/appellant(s) to cure the defect/office
objection,     however,    due    to     non-removal     of    office
objection/default within the prescribed time, the concerned
matter was required to be once again listed before the Court.
The Court granted further time, by passing common order on
the earlier occasion.
         In spite of repeated opportunity ( three times-one under
Rules, second by the Registrar and third by Court), the
petitioner(s), applicant(s)/appellant(s) has failed to cure the
office objection/default. As a result, by way of indulgence and
last opportunity, in terms of this order, SIX WEEKS further time
is granted to the petitioner(s), applicant(s)/appellant(s) in the
respective matters to remove office objection/default and make
the matter ready for further hearing within that time, failing
which the concerned petition/application/appeal shall stand
dismissed for non-prosecution without further reference to the
Court.
         Provided,    however,     in     cases,       where     the
objection/default is about non-service of any of the
respondent, on expiry of the extended period, the

concerned matter will stand dismissed for non- prosecution only against the unserved respondent (s), without further reference to the Court. The matter would then proceed against the remaining respondent (s).

2

In cases where the office objection/default has already been cured before passing of this order, it will be open to the concerned party to bring that fact to the notice of the Registrar (Judicial-II), who may examine the same and proceed with the matter as per the listing scheme, if ready for hearing.

If the office objections are removed within the time extended in terms of this order, the concerned matter(s) be made returnable on the date notified hereafter.



                Cases as per cause list number              Returnable Date

                           1001 to 1007                        23/02/2018




                (Sanjay Yadav)                     (Ashok Kumar Joshi)
                   Judge                                Judge

   Aman




AMAN TIWARI
2018.01.15 18:03:01
+05'30'