Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 11]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Commnr. Of Income-Tax, Delhi- Viii vs M/S. Sae Refield Welfare Trust Ltd. on 10 September, 2014

Bench: Kurian Joseph, Rohinton Fali Nariman

                          IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

                          CIVIL    APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                         CIVIL APPEAL NO. 3559 OF 2007

           COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, DELHI-VIII     ...   APPELLANT(s)

                                  Versus

       M/S. SAE REFIELD OFFICE MONTHLY PAID     ... RESPONDENT(s)
       EMPLOYEES WELFARE TRUST
                                WITH
                      CIVIL APPEAL NO. 3585 OF 2007

           COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, NEW DELHI      ...   APPELLANT(s)

                                  Versus

       M/S. SAE DEORY WORKS M.P.E.W. TRUST            ...   RESPONDENT(s)

                                    WITH
                         CIVIL APPEAL NO. 3598 OF 2007

           COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, DELHI-VIII     ...   APPELLANT(s)

                                  Versus

       M/S. SAE REFIELD OFFICE       M.P.E.W. TRUST   ...   RESPONDENT(s)

                                   WITH
                         CIVIL APPEAL NO. 3583 OF 2007

           COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, DELHI          ...   APPELLANT(s)

                                  Versus

       M/S. SAE REFIELD OFFICE MONTHLY PAID
Signature Not Verified
                                                      ...   RESPONDENT(s)
       EMPLOYEES WELFARE TRUST
Digitally signed by
Pardeep Kumar
Date: 2014.09.24
17:52:54 SAST
Reason:
                    : 2 :

                        WITH
              CIVIL APPEAL NO. 3584 OF 2007

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, DELHI        ...   APPELLANT(s)

                     Versus

M/S. SAE REFIELD OFFICE M.P.E.W. TRUST   ...   RESPONDENT(s)


                        WITH
           CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 3595-3596 OF 2007

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, DELHI-VIII   ...   APPELLANT(s)

                     Versus

M/S. SAE SR. OFFICERS WELFARE TRUST      ...   RESPONDENT(s)


                        WITH
              CIVIL APPEAL NO. 3597 OF 2007

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, DELHI-VIII   ...   APPELLANT(s)

                     Versus

M/S. SAE EXECUTIVE WELFARE TRUST         ...   RESPONDENT(s)


                        WITH
              CIVIL APPEAL NO. 3573 OF 2007

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, DELHI        ...   APPELLANT(s)

                     Versus

M/S. SAE FIELD OFFICE MONTHLY PAID       ...   RESPONDENT(s)
EMPLOYEES WELFARE TRUST
                             : 3 :


                        WITH
              CIVIL APPEAL NO. 3576 OF 2007

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, DELHI-VIII              ...   APPELLANT(s)

                         Versus

M/S. SAE REFIELD OFFICE MONTHLY PAID                ...   RESPONDENT(s)
EMPLOYEES WELFARE TRUST


                     O   R    D    E   R



            We have heard Mr. Arijit Prasad, learned

   counsel for the revenue and Mr. S. Ganesh, learned

   senior counsel for the assessee.

   2.       Having regard to the amendment in Section

   164(1) of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 (for short “1961

   Act”) by Finance (No. 2) Act, 1980 which                 has done

   away with the deeming provision whereby a trust

   under   Section   164(1)       of   the   1961    Act    could   be

   assessed as though it was association of persons,

   the view taken by the High Court in the impugned

   order cannot be said to suffer from any legal flaw.

   The view that has been taken in the impugned
                     : 4 :




order is in line with the decisions of High Courts

of Calcutta, Gujarat and Madras in “Commissioner

of    Income   Tax   vs.     Shri    Krishna     Bandar   Trust”1,

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Deepak Family Trust

No. 1 and others2 and Commissioner of Income Tax

vs.     Venu    Suresh       Sanjay      Trust     and     others3

respectively.

3.        Civil Appeals are, accordingly, dismissed

with no order as to costs.




                                    .......................CJI.
                                    (R.M. LODHA)


                                    ........................J.
                                    (KURIAN JOSEPH)


NEW DELHI;                          ........................J.
SEPTEMBER 10, 2014                  (ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN)




1 (1993) 201 ITR 989 (Cal)
2 (1995) 211 ITR 575 (Guj)
3 (1996) 221 ITR 649 (Mad)
ITEM NO.107                  COURT NO.1                    SECTION IIIA

                S U P R E M E C O U R T O F          I N D I A
                        RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

                    Civil Appeal    No(s).   3559/2007

COMMNR. OF INCOME-TAX, DELHI- VIII                         Appellant(s)

                                    VERSUS

M/S. SAE REFIELD OFFICE MONTHLY PAID EMPLOYEES WELFARE TRUST
                                                 Respondent(s)

(with office report)
WITH
C.A. No. 3585/2007, C.A. No. 3598/2007
(With Office Report), C.A. No. 3583/2007
(With Office Report), C.A. No. 3584/2007
(With Office Report), C.A. No. 3595-3596/2007
C.A. No. 3597/2007,
(With Office Report)
C.A. No. 3573/2007,
(With Office Report)
C.A. No. 3576/2007,
(With Office Report)

Date : 10/09/2014 These appeals were called on for hearing today.

CORAM :
              HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
              HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH
              HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN

For Appellant(s)     Mr.   Arijit Prasad, Adv.
                     Mr.   S.W.A. Qadri, Adv.
                     Ms.   Sadhna Sandhu, Adv.for
                     Mr.   B. V. Balaram Das,Adv.

For Respondent(s)    Mr. S. Ganesh, Sr. Adv.
                     Mr. M. K. Garg,Adv.
                     Ms. Shakumbri Singh, Adv.

          UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                             O R D E R

Civil Appeals are dismissed in terms of signed order. No costs.





          (PARDEEP KUMAR)                       (RENU DIWAN)
             AR-cum-PS                          COURT MASTER

[SIGNED ORDER IS PLACED ON THE FILE]