Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Orissa High Court

Unknown vs State Of Odisha And Another on 15 October, 2025

Author: G. Satapathy

Bench: G. Satapathy

             IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

            Ashish Barada and others
            (In CRLA No.987 of 2025)
            Bainath Bisoyi
            (In CRLA No.947 of 2025)
            Siba Shankar Mohanty @ Siba
            @ Sibasankar and others
            (In CRLA No.960 of 2025)
            Jagabandhu Swain
            (In CRLA No.1017 of 2025)
            Prabhakar Behera
            (In CRLA No.1057 of 2025)
            Balaram Gouda
            (In CRLA No.1081 of 2025) ...                  Appellants

                                         Mr. G. Mohanty, Advocate
                                         (in CRLA No.987 of 2025)
                                            Mr. N. Lenka, Advocate
                                         (in CRLA No.947 of 2025)
                                          Mr. A. Tripathy, Advocate
                                         (in CRLA No.960 of 2025)
                                            Mr. J. Sahoo, Advocate
                                        (in CRLA No.1017 of 2025)
                                          Mr. S.S. Ray-2, Advocate
                               (in CRLA Nos.1057 & 1081 of 2025)
                                 -versus-
            State of Odisha and another        ...     Respondents
                                       Mr. P. Satpathy, Addl. PP
                              Ms. J. Naik, Advocate (Informant)
                               CORAM:
                        JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY

                              ORDER(ORAL)
Order No.                      15.10.2025
   02.         1.      This   matter   is   taken   up   through    Hybrid

Arrangement (Virtual/Physical Mode).

2. Since these six CRLAs arise out of one and same case record, the same are heard together and disposed Page 1 of 4 of by this common order with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties.

3. These criminal appeals in nature of Section 14-A of the Scheduled Caste & Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 together with amendment Act, 2016 (in short, "the Act") are directed against the impugned orders dated 29.07.2025/11.09.2025 passed in GR Case No.15 of 2025 (Spl. Act) by which the learned Additional Sessions Judge-Cum-Special Judge (under SC & ST Act), Aska, Ganjam has refused to release the appellants on bail in connection with Dharakote PS Case No.240 of 2025, for commission of offence punishable U/Ss.126(2)/ 115(2)/ 296/ 303(2)/ 308(2)/ 356(2)/ 3(5) of BNS r/w Sections 3(1)(r)/3(1)(s)/3(2)(va) of the Act, on the main allegation of assaulting the informant and another by tonsuring half of the hair on the head of the informant and attempting to take away their life on the ground that the informant belongs to "SC" caste.

4. Heard, Mr. G. Mohanty, learned counsel for the appellant in CRLA No.987 of 2025; Mr. Niranjan Lenka, learned counsel for the appellant in CRLA No.947 of 2025; Mr. Amitav Tripathy, learned counsel for the appellant in CRLA No.960 of 2025; Mr. Jyotirmaya Sahoo, learned counsel for the appellant in CRLA No.1017 of 2025; Mr. Sidhartha Sankar Ray-2, learned counsel for the appellant in CRLA Nos.1057 & 1081 of 2025; Ms. Jayanti Naik, learned counsel for the Page 2 of 4 informant and Mr. P. Satpathy, learned Additional Public Prosecutor in the matter and perused the record.

5. Bail to the appellants is mainly opposed to on the ground that the appellants have intentionally assaulted & humiliated the informant and another, and attempted to their life, but the FIR story reveals the allegation against the appellants for doing this act on suspecting the informant and another to be the illegal transporters/traders of the cattle. In view of the above facts and after having considered the rival submissions and taking into consideration the nature and gravity of the offence alleged against the appellants vis-a-vis the accusations sought to be brought against them and taking into account all the materials placed on record and regard being had to the pre trial detention of the appellants in custody with submission of charge-sheet in the meantime and keeping in view the right of the accused to be presumed innocent until proven guilty at the trial and taking into account the progress in investigation in this case and grant of bail to co-accused Narayan Dakua @ Mitu, Omm Gouda @ Om Gouda and Ganapati Polei @ India and another in CRLA Nos.915, 931 & 970 of 2025, this Court without expressing any view on the merits, considers it proper to admit each of the appellants to bail, notwithstanding to the serious objection as raised by the learned counsel for the informant.

Page 3 of 4

6. Hence, the CRLA Nos.987, 947, 960, 1017, 1057 & 1081 of 2025 stand allowed and the impugned order is hereby quashed/set aside. Consequently, the appellants namely Narayan Ashish Barada, Sunil Swain @ Megha, Rittu @ Santosh Kumar Polei, Bainath Bisoyi, Siba Shankar Mohanty @ Siba @ Sibasankar, Satya Sahu, Rajesh Kumar Samal, Sankar Das, Mantu Bisoyi @ Pintu, Jagabandhu Swain, Prabhakar Behera and Balaram Gouda be released on bail on such terms and conditions as deem fit and proper by the learned Court in seisin over the matter.

7. Issue urgent certified copy of the order as per Rules.

(G. Satapathy) Judge Subhasmita Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: SUBHASMITA DAS Designation: Sr. Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 16-Oct-2025 10:47:56 Page 4 of 4