Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

M/S Kwality Biscuits Ltd vs K Dinesh on 2 April, 2009

Author: Huluvadi G.Ramesh

Bench: Huluvadi G.Ramesh

1}»? am}: me}: {Z'.{)UR"f 0:: KARENE;-'X'£'AKA AT BA';\EGAL.C}?€£_;E -1 i' f» _ _ Dated this the 2" day atxsspni, 2669 .Befer::: _ mg HONBLE MR .i£iS"}'YC}r? Iffli ai:.z«;»:i;r1T 22495133.?" T' * Writ Petition 32%z.*2g2oS%%%V(:; T232; I Benwen:

M93 Kwaiity Biscuits Ltd P' B 3992, Mysore Road Bangaiore 569 039 _ . i ..
By' §%sFac£<>ryMa;1ager   _    '  i3etii:ianer
(By Srilii Czvrabhakaafg        '

And:

Sri K ibimshf , _

Rajeshwarifianteei; V V' .  * _  

Opp: to Bffiil;---,E\;iytsore R(:¥ad '~V _ T' Bangalore 569 839 - .. Respeandant {By Sri f§§arayanas§a?3m;}g; ,}5xciv.v} » 'This .Wf§$ '§éfi'££0n is fiied under Ar£.226;"22?' cf the Cozzstiturien przayfingfix aesyayrd éataé 8.11..-2964 in ID 9333998 -- annaxure H. ' Wrii 'P'-'giiilian coming an fer hearing this day, the Court maéra the foHoiving':A ' ' 012£3ER . f§i'z&1agement is kxeferrs this Court being aggrieveii by fizz: order 91"
.:'_;*fz§§31s£3tem::z1t pasam by ii-'re Add}. L§boyr- Cfiurg Bangalsre in 113 9313993. 3 Per cczzrntra, waztsel representing the workman submiiied, em gazing thmugx the rrzaterial an recerd, having tighth; appreaiated, fihe Laban: has (mama is 3 fast eomzlusien that the charges are not pmved. T}1e_gi'aS;: .§;fi¢: ;_. é ' respandent has been pI'(}pfi1'I}' censidered and he has bcén..0r;§i:ér§€i 'A--f§.5 be reinstaied with 58% back wages and the 33:33:? canggdt déniefii _ j raspondent workman.
:21 the light 9f the arguments aéV\»;':1w;a;:§z*::i,b skgpeigit §:{§§és'~:7{;«: censideratiam is whether the La%ou2i,.Cfourt c§n*g;iii:aé"agy effér ir>.A;3a5.:::';z1g the imgugzed award and whefitar the The xiature a1f4_Vt§_i:Ve' c>;;*:::1:sir.,1s;;§<'ViV Vit.}.:_4'§E":V&_;v'i:»;$:3ri§;:{an was shiffing of Ezviawfit barges in ihei Bate éke alieged maiden: i.:z.,
30.£.1997 vhe went: ti} empty in tha uaiaading Wiflgfiiiif' an}? he is said $0 have abuseci ihe 9fii{:éa£ gupgrier " Iayanfiigfi Vihsga fiithy Zanguage and Guvageé ha: :§i§}€§2§ty' ié%*a3g~-LA::::f a3;pr¢#s;§e£xs;"'Eifixni.}iated and insuized her in the preseizca £31' 0:£'§§e1*'fé1§a:s3:'V '§%{FO:fV1-'. éi'fl;7'V§§":4.3a aim expressed fibssene wards, Despite atfivice net fa $42.: 'he abugitzg her. Aitmzazgh the afficial superior iefi the'. .p4iar':.§ as 3115' cméiri fiéét Wifhsiand the immfléaiicm, tbs witzrkman feilawed her ; -- éi:1{3'V.;:':31ise{i--- her fiithy ianguage. {}n this ailegafiien, inquiry was helé. On