Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

Tvl.Aswini Foundations vs Assistant Commissioner (Ct) on 12 March, 2012

Author: M.Jaichandren

Bench: M.Jaichandren

       

  

  

 
 
 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 12.3.2012

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN 

Writ Petition No.3390 of 2012


     TVL.ASWINI FOUNDATIONS                  [ PETITIONER  ]
     NO.46, MOUNT POONAMALLEE ROAD  
	NANDAMBAKKAM  
     CHENNAI-600 089.


          Vs

     ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (CT)             [ RESPONDENT  ]
     NANDANAM ASSESSMENT CIRCLE  
	46, GREENWAYS ROAD  
	CHENNAI-600 028.




	This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the respondent and quash the assessment proceedings in TNGST 1582246/2006-07 dated 07.09.2011 issued therein and direct the respondent to pass fresh self assessment orders as per section 87-A of TNVAT Act.


		For petitioner  : Mr.C.Baktha Siromoni
	     For respondents : Mr.A.R.Jayaprathap
					   Government Advocate (Taxes)




O R D E R

Heard the learned counsels appearing for both sides.

2. The main contention of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner is that the impugned order passed by the respondent, dated 7.9.2011, is arbitrary and illegal, as it is contrary to Section 87-A of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006. Since, the period in question is from 1.4.2006 to 31.12.2006, a Self Assessment order ought to have been passed by the respondent. Instead, the respondent had made a Best Judgment Assessment, by disallowing the concession and exemption. Therefore, the impugned order of the respondent, dated 7.9.2011, is to be set aside and the matter is to be remitted back to the respondent for being considered, afresh, in accordance with Section 87-A of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006, for passing an appropriate order.

3. The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent has no objection for this Court passing such an order.

4. In view of the above, the impugned order of the respondent, dated 7.9.2011, is set aside and the matter is remitted back to the respondent for passing a fresh assessment order, in view of Section 87-A of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

The writ petition is ordered accordingly. No costs. Connected M.P.No.1 of 2012 is closed.


12.3.2012
INDEX    : YES/NO
INTERNET : YES/NO

Note: Issue order copy on 13.3.2012

lan


To:

     ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (CT)             
     NANDANAM ASSESSMENT CIRCLE  
	46, GREENWAYS ROAD  
	CHENNAI-600 028.









M.JAICHANDREN  J.,




lan














Writ Petition No.3390 of 2012





















12.3.2012