Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Delhi High Court - Orders

Mdd Medical Systems (India) Pvt. Ltd vs Delhi International Arbitration ... on 20 February, 2020

Author: Prathiba M. Singh

Bench: Prathiba M. Singh

$~27 and 28
*     IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+     W.P.(C) 10850/2019 and CM APPL. 44897/2019, 44898/2019,
      44899/2019, 45233/2019, 45233/2019
      MDD MEDICAL SYSTEMS (INDIA) PVT. LTD.           ..... Petitioner
                       Through: Mr. T.S. Nanda, Proxy counsel

                  versus
     DELHI INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE
     AND ORS.                                  ..... Respondents
                  Through: Mr. Vikrant N. Goyal, Proxy counsel
                           Mr. Siddharth Aggarwal and Mr.
                           Ateka Khan Advocates for DIAC, R-
                           1 (M: 9319396971).
                           Ms. Smiti Verma, proxy counsel for
                           R-1 (M: 8828446871).

28                   WITH
+    W.P.(C) 10859/2019 and CM APPL. 44913/2019, 44914/2019,
     44915/2019
     LSR MEDICAL PVT LTD                            ..... Petitioner
                     Through: Mr. T.S. Nanda, Proxy counsel

                  versus
     DELHI INTERNATIONAL ARBITARTION CENTRE THROUGH:
     ITS COORDINATOR & ORS                      ..... Respondents
                  Through: Mr. Vikrant N. Goyal, Proxy counsel
                             Mr. Siddharth Aggarwal and Mr.
                             Ateka Khan Advocates for DIAC, R-
                             1 (M: 9319396971).
                             Ms. Smiti Verma, proxy counsel for
                             R-1 (M: 8828446871).
     CORAM:
     JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH
                  ORDER

% 20.02.2020 Lawyers are abstaining from work. Ld. counsel for the Delhi International Arbitration Centre (DIAC) has appeared and she submits that the interpretation being given to Section 85 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 by the Petitioner, is incorrect. Let a short note on the interpretation of the Section be filed.

List for hearing on 14th August, 2020.

PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.

FEBRUARY 20, 2020 MR