Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Raminder Kaur & Anr vs State Of Punjab & Others on 17 May, 2018

Author: Anupinder Singh Grewal

Bench: Anupinder Singh Grewal

           IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
                        AT CHANDIGARH


                                          CRM NO. M-21190 of 2018
                                          DECIDED ON : 17.05.2018

Raminder Kaur and another
                                                             ...Petitioners
                                   Versus

State of Punjab and others
                                                             ...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL Present: Mr. Mohit Kakkar, Advocate, for the petitioners.

Anupinder Singh Grewal, J.(oral) The petitioners are seeking a direction to the official respondents to protect their life and liberty as they apprehend danger from respondents No. 4 to 6.

It is stated in the petition that petitioners have performed their marriage, which is against the will of private respondents and they have apprehension that the private respondents might cause physical harm to them.

Learned counsel for the petitioners has drawn my attention to the representation dated 15.05.2018 sent by the petitioners to respondent No. 2-Commissioner of Police, Amritsar (Annexure P-5).

Issue notice to respondents No. 1 to 3 only. At the asking of the Court Mr. Ramandeep Sandhu, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No. 1 to 3.

1 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 20-05-2018 00:50:29 ::: CRM NO. M-21190 of 2018 -2- Keeping in view the mandate of Supreme Court in the case of "Lata Singh V. State of U.P. and another", JT 2006(6) SC 173, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 2- Commissioner of Police, Amritsar, to look into the matter and take appropriate action in accordance with law to ensure that no harm is caused to the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of private respondents.

It is clarified that this order shall not be treated as a stamp of this Court about the marriage of the parties and no opinion with regard to the validity of the marriage has been expressed in this order.




                                        (ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL)
                                                   JUDGE
May 17, 2018
kanchan

             Whether speaking/reasoned ?             Yes/No
             Whether reportable ?                    Yes/No




                               2 of 2
            ::: Downloaded on - 20-05-2018 00:50:30 :::