Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

R.Senthilkumar vs State Rep. By on 4 November, 2020

Author: R. Pongiappan

Bench: R.Pongiappan

                                                                                 Crl.O.P No.7065 of 2019

                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                              DATED : 04.11.2020

                                                     CORAM

                              THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.PONGIAPPAN

                                           Crl.O.P No.7065 of 2019
                                         and Crl.M.P.No.3885 of 2019

                 R.Senthilkumar                                                    ... Petitioner

                                                         Vs.
                 1. State rep. by
                    The Inspector of Police,
                    Tambaram Railway Police Station,
                    Chennai Railway Police District.
                    Crime No.332 of 2018.

                 2. Lakshmi                                                        ...Respondents


                 PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 407 of the Code of
                 Criminal Procedure to call for the records pertaining to the Crime No.332 of
                 2018 pending on the file of the 1st respondent police and quash the same against
                 the petitioner.

                                    For Petitioner             : Mr.P.Sri Ganesh

                                    For 1st Respondent         : Mr.S.Karthikeyan
                                                                 Additional Public Prosecutor

                                    For 2nd Respondent         : No appearance

                                                      -----
                                                     ORDER

http://www.judis.nic.in 1 of 6 Crl.O.P No.7065 of 2019 The present Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking a relief to quash the F.I.R registered in Crime No.332 of 2018 pending on the file of the first respondent police as illegal.

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the first respondent police.

3. Earlier, on receipt of the complaint given by the second respondent, the first respondent police herein registered a case against the petitioner in Crime No.332 of 2018. In the complaint given by the second respondent to the first respondent, it is alleged that the petitioner herein being the husband of the second respondent everyday came to his residence in a drunken mood. Further, after giving birth of one female child, the petitioner herein neglected the second respondent and committed domestic violence. In the meantime, the petitioner married one another girl and the same was not informed to the second respondent. Resultantly, upon the complaint given by the second respondent, the present criminal case has been registered against the petitioner.

http://www.judis.nic.in 2 of 6 Crl.O.P No.7065 of 2019

4. Firstly, in respect to the quashing of the impugned F.I.R., only ground raised by the petitioner herein is that the first respondent being a Railway Police not at all having power to register the case against the petitioner for the alleged offences under Sections 403, 409, 506 (i), 494, and 498(A) of I.P.C.

5. Now on considering the said submission with relevant records, it is true that the alleged occurrence had happened at No.16, Moorthi Nagar, 2nd Street, Thirumullaivail, Chennai – 600 062, and there is no dispute that the first respondent police is not at all having any territorial jurisdiction for registering this case. In this regard, Section 177 of Cr.P.C. reads as follows:-

“177. Ordinary place of inquiry and trial—Every offence shall ordinarily be inquired into and tried by a Court within whose local jurisdiction it was committed”. Since the occurrence pertains to the F.I.R. had happened away from the jurisdiction of the Railway Police Station. The prayer sought for by the petitioner is having some force.

6. The Union Ministry of Home Affairs vide communication February 6, 2014, while placing reliance on the dictum of the Supreme Court in Lalita Kumar v. State of UP, inter alia directed registration of FIR irrespective http://www.judis.nic.in 3 of 6 Crl.O.P No.7065 of 2019 of territorial jurisdiction through Zero FIR. It had advised that “when it becomes apparent that even if the offence has been committed outside the jurisdiction of the police station, Zero FIR would be registered and the FIR will then be transferred to the appropriate police station as per Section 170 of Cr.P.C. Therefore, an appropriate order in this petition is to direct the first respondent police to transfer the petition mentioned F.I.R. to All Women Police Station, Tambaram.

7. Accordingly, the first respondent is directed to transfer the F.I.R. registered in Crime No.332 of 2018 to the file of All Women Police Station, Tambaram, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On such receipt of the F.I.R, the Station House Officer, All Women Police Station, Tambaram, is directed to complete the investigation within a period of four months.

With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

04.11.2020 asi http://www.judis.nic.in 4 of 6 Crl.O.P No.7065 of 2019 To

1. The Inspector of Police, Tambaram Railway Police Station, Chennai Railway Police District.

2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

http://www.judis.nic.in 5 of 6 Crl.O.P No.7065 of 2019 R. PONGIAPPAN, J.

asi Crl.O.P No.7065 of 2019 and Crl.M.P.No.3885 of 2019 04.11.2020 http://www.judis.nic.in 6 of 6