Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Delhi High Court - Orders

Pallavi Sharma vs Rajeev Sharma on 11 May, 2023

Author: Sanjeev Sachdeva

Bench: Sanjeev Sachdeva

                          $~3
                          *     IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
                          +     MAT.APP.(F.C.) 96/2023
                                PALLAVI SHARMA                                       ..... Appellant
                                                    Through:     Mr. Prosenjeet Banerjee, Mr. Vikrant
                                                                 Kumar, Ms. Sudeshna and
                                                                 Mr. Sarthak, Advocates.
                                                    versus

                                RAJEEV SHARMA                                        ..... Respondent
                                                    Through:     None.
                                CORAM:
                                HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA
                                HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
                                                    ORDER

% 11.05.2023 CM APPL. 18739/2023 (exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.

MAT.APP.(F.C.) 96/2023 & CM APPL. 18738/2023 (for condonation of delay)

1. Appellant impugns order dated 18.01.2023 whereby the Family Court, on a petition filed by the respondent, has granted divorce on the allegation of cruelty.

2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the Family Court has erred in not appreciating that none of the allegations constituted cruelty as required under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. He further submits that the allegations were not even substantiated and the Family Court has misread the evidence as well as the cross-examination in Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:SONIA THAPLIYAL MAT.APP.(F.C.) 96/2023 1 Signing Date:12.05.2023 17:55:39 coming to a conclusion that some of the allegations were duly proved. He, without prejudice, submits that even if proved, the allegations do not constitute cruelty of a nature as required under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Act for grant of divorce.

3. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that as per the information of the appellant, the respondent has not solemnized another marriage in the meantime.

4. Issue notice to the respondent through all modes, returnable on 05th September, 2023.

5. Till the next date of hearing, the operation of the order dated 18.01.2023 shall remain stayed. Consequently, the respondent shall be restrained from solemnizing another marriage till the next date of hearing.

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J MANOJ JAIN, J MAY 11, 2023 st Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:SONIA THAPLIYAL MAT.APP.(F.C.) 96/2023 2 Signing Date:12.05.2023 17:55:39