Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 2]

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Delhi

Acit, Meerut vs Ankur Singhal, Meerut on 19 December, 2016

       IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
            DELHI BENCHES : A : NEW DELHI

     BEFORE SHRI R.S. SYAL, AM & SHRI K.N. CHARY, JM

                        ITA No.3140/Del/2012
                       Assessment Year : 2008-09

ACIT,                           Vs. Ankur Singhal,
Circle-1,                           Prop. M/s Spacedek,
Meerut.                             36, Kishanpuri,
                                    Meerut.

                                     PAN: AJRPS2367Q

              Assessee By      : Shri Sanjeev Sapra, Advocate
              Deptt. By        : Shri S.K. Jain, DR

            Date of Hearing          :   19.12.2016
            Date of Pronouncement    :   19.12.2016

                                ORDER

PER R.S. SYAL, AM:

This appeal by the Revenue arises out of the order passed by the CIT(A) on 30.03.2012 in relation to the assessment year 2008-09.

ITA No.3140/Del/2012

2. The only issue raised in this appeal is against the deletion of disallowance of deduction u/s 80IC of the Act, amounting to Rs.17,64,970/-.

3. During the course of hearing, the ld. AR submitted that pursuant to the mandate of section 268A, the CBDT has issued Circular No. 21 of 2015 dated 10.12.2015 with retrospective effect, revising the monetary limit to Rs.10,00,000/- for not filing appeals before the Tribunal. He further submitted that as the tax effect involved in the instant appeal is less than Rs.10,00,000/-, the extant appeal is not maintainable. The ld. D.R., although supported the order of the Assessing Officer, but could not controvert the fact that tax effect involved in this appeal is less than Rs.10,00,000/-.

4. We have heard the parties and perused the relevant material on record. Going by the prescription of the aforenoted Circular, we are of the view that the Revenue should have either not filed the instant appeal before the Tribunal or 2 ITA No.3140/Del/2012 withdrawn the same as the tax effect in this appeal is admittedly less than the prescribed limit for not filing the appeals. From para 10 of the above Circular it is palpable that the Instruction is applicable to the pending appeals also with retrospective effect and there is a clear-cut direction to the Department to withdraw or not press such appeals filed before the ITAT wherein tax effect is less than Rs.10,00,000/-. Ex conseqeunti we dismiss the instant appeal without going into merits of the case.

5. In the result, the appeal of the Revenue stands dismissed.

Order Pronounced in the open Court on 19.12.2016.

               Sd/-                              Sd/-
        [K.N. CHARY]                      [R.S. SYAL]
     JUDICIAL MEMBER                  ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

Dated, 19th December, 2016.
dk




                               3
                                 ITA No.3140/Del/2012


Copy forwarded to:
  1.   Appellant
  2.   Respondent
  3.   CIT
  4.   CIT (A)
  5.   DR, ITAT

                         AR, ITAT, NEW DELHI.




                     4