Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Central Administrative Tribunal - Chandigarh

Barkha Ram vs Archaeological Survey Of India on 13 February, 2018

Author: P. Gopinath

Bench: P. Gopinath

                                  1
                                              (OA No. 060/00174/2018 )


              CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
                    CHANDIGARH BENCH
                             ...

        ORIGINAL APPLICATION N0. 060/00174/2018

    Chandigarh, this the 13TH day of February, 2018
                           ...
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. SANJEEV KAUSHIK, MEMBER (J) &
       HON'BLE MRS. P. GOPINATH, MEMBER (A)
                            ...

Barkha Ram age about 45 years son of Sh. Hirda Ram, (Grouop-D),

working as Multi Task Worker (M.W.), Cultural Hub, Interpretation

Centre, Adi Badri, Distt. Yamuna Nagar, resident of Village

Kathgarh, Tehsil Bilaspur, Distt. Yamuna Nagar, Haryana.



                                                     ....APPLICANT
(Argued by: Shri Jasbir Mor, Advocate)

                         VERSUS
  1. Union of India through its Secretary, Govt. of India,
     Department of Archaeological Survey of India, Janpath, New
     Delhi.
  2. The Director General, Archaeological Survey of India, Govt. of
     India, Janpath, New Delhi.
  3. Superintending Archaeologist, Archaeological Survey of India,
     Chandigarh Circle Chandigarh, Bays No. 51-52, Sector 31-A,
     Chandigarh.
  4. The Conversation Assistant, Archaeological Survey of India,
     Sheikh Chilli Tomb, Thanesar, Distt. Kurukshetra, Haryana.


                                                ....RESPONDENTS
                         ORDER (Oral)

SANJEEV KAUSHIK, MEMBER (J) Learned counsel for applicant after arguing for some time, seeks permission to withdraw the instant Original Application 2 (OA No. 060/00174/2018 ) (O.A.), with liberty to file fresh one, on the same cause of action, with better particulars.

2. Therefore, the O.A. is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for.





 (P. GOPINATH)                         (SANJEEV KAUSHIK)
   MEMBER (A)                                MEMBER (J)

                                      Dated:   13.02.2018
`SK'
 3
    (OA No. 060/00174/2018 )