Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Delhi

A.H.Multisoft P.Ltd, New Delhi vs Ito, Ward-1(1), New Delhi on 6 October, 2023

         IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
               DELHI BENCH 'A', NEW DELHI
            Before Sh. Saktijit Dey, Vice President
           Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Accountant Member
                    SA No. 336/Del/2023
     (in ITA No. 2400/Del/2023 : Asstt. Year : 2016-17)
A. H. Multisoft P. Ltd.,                  Vs    Income Tax Officer,
C/o Sanjiv Sapra & Associates LLP, CAs          Ward-1(1),
C-763, New Friends Colony,                      New Delhi-110002
New Delhi-110025
(APPELLANT)                                     (RESPONDENT)
PAN NO. AAGCA0146C

                 Assessee by : Sh. Sanjiv Sapra, CA
                 Revenue by : Sh. Vivek K. Upadhyay, Sr. DR
Date of Hearing: 22.09.2023      Date of Pronouncement: 06.10.2023


                                ORDER

Per Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Accountant Member:

Captioned application has been filed by the assessee seeking stay on recovery of outstanding demand pertaining to Assessment Year 2016-17.

2. Heard the arguments of both the parties and peruse d the material available on record.

3. The tax position is as under:

      Income Tax              Rs.10,49,51 ,739
      Interest                Rs.3,46,22,116
      Total                   Rs.13,95,73 ,855
      Demand Paid             Rs.2,80,57,351
                                            2                                SA No. 336/Del/2023
                                                                          A.H. Multisoft Pvt. Ltd.

4. The demand has been raised by the Revenue by invoking Rule 11UA(1)(b) of I.T. Rules with reference to provisio ns of Section 56(2 )(viib). It was argued that the AO has made addition of contrary to the provisions of Expla nation A-1 of Section 56. It was submitted that the assessee ha s already paid an amount of Rs.2.80 Cr.

5. Having considered the prima facie case and gone through the financials of the assessee, we are of the view that this is a fit case to grant absolute stay. Further, we dire ct the Registry to fix the appeal for hearing on 28.11.2023. Paper boo ks, if any, must be filed by the parties in the meanwhile. Since, the date of hearing of appeal was announced in the open court, there is no need for issuing separate hearing notices to the parties.

6. In the result, the Stay Application of the assessee is allowed.

Order Pronounced in the Open Court on 06/10/202 3 .

             Sd /-                                               S d/ -

 (Saktijit Dey)                                       (Dr. B. R. R. Kumar)
 Vice President                                       Accountant Member
Dated: 06/10/2023
*Subodh Kumar, Sr. PS*
Copy forwarded to:
1. Appellant
2. Respondent
3. CIT
4. CIT(Appeals)
5. DR: ITAT
                                                             ASSISTANT REGISTRAR