Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Mohan K Horahatti vs Syndicate Bank on 13 February, 2012

Author: N.K.Patil

Bench: N.K.Patil

  IN THE HIGH ('OURT OF KARNATAKA
                                   , CIRCUIT BENCH AT
                       I) I AR WAD

      DATED THIS TIlE LV      DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2012

                          :BEFORE

            THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.K. PAT
                                            IL

               \kPiNo .1944 lof 2002
                                     j
 Between:

Mohan K. Horahatti,
Aged about 54 years,
S/o. Krishnaswam\.
Earlier working as Deput' Chief Off
                                    icer,
An Officer in Middle Manaemen
                               t Grade
Scale 11, Syndicate Bank,
Zonal Office, Calcutta since
Compulsorily retired and
Residing at No.C 1 2o,
Shivagiri La\ out.
Opp. V. Block,
Vidh\ agiri,
Bagalkot 587 101
Bagalkot Dist.
                                            Petitioner
(B\ Smt. Sindhu Potdar. Advocate-A
                                   bsent)
And

Syndicate Bank,
A body constituted under the
Banking Companies (Acquisition
and Transfer of
Undertakings) Act. 1970.
Rep.b\ its General Manager (P).
    Industrial Relations D
                          ivision,
   Head Office,
    Manipal 5761 l.
   Udupi Dist,

                                              Respondent
   (B\ M/s. Sundarasw
                      amv, Ramdas & Anand
                                         . Advocates)
        This    \V.P. is filed unde
                                    r   Article 226 nf the
  Constitution of India.
                          with a prayer to quas
                                                 h the order
  dated 3l.2.2002 pa
                        ssed by the Disciplin
                                               ary Authority
  vide Annexure-R an
                       d order dated 27.2
                                          .2002 passed by
 the Appellate Authorit
                         y vide Annexure-T,
                                               and to direct
 the respondent to re
                       instate him into the
                                             services of the
 Bank forthwith with
                          arrears of salary.
                                              continuity of
 service and all ot
                      her service benefit
                                           s flowing from
 quashing of the afor
                      esaid orders.

      This W.P ..c oming
                           on for orders this
 Court made the follo                         day,      the
                      wing

                            :ORDER:

When this matter ha d come up for cons ideration before this Court on 7.6.2011. 22.6.2011 and on 16.8.2011 none ap peared for petitione r. Today also, when the matter is taken up for consid eration, neither the petitioner nor the counsel for th e petitioner is present. It shows that the are not diligent in prosecuting this case . Hence. this petitio n is liable to be dismissed for no n prosecution. Acc ordingl3. it is dismissed for non pr osecution.

Sdh JUDGE tsn*