Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 14]

Supreme Court of India

P.J. Sunderrajan And Anr. vs Unit Trust Of India And Anr. on 30 October, 1990

Equivalent citations: (1993)ILLJ168SC, AIRONLINE 1990 SC 68, (1993) 3 SERV LR 21, (1993) 1 LAB LJ 168, (1993) 66 FAC LR 1038, (1993) 1 LAB LN 656, (1993) 22 ALL LR 141, 1993 LAB LR 461

Author: R.M. Sahai

Bench: R.M. Sahai

ORDER
  

Mr. Kochu Thommen, J.
 

1. Delay condoned.

2. Special leave granted.

3. Heard parties. We have perused the records. We are of the view that the departmental enquiry should be stayed till the trial which is stated to be, pending in the Court of the, Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Madras is completed. The enquiry shall accordingly stand stayed. However, it will be open to the respondents to proceed with the enquiry, if they so choose, after the Trial Court has rendered its judgment, whether or not any appeal is taken from that judgment to a higher court. We are told that the trial has been pending since May, 1989, and many witnesses have already been examined. Accordingly we expect the Trial Court to complete the trial within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

4. In the circumstances, the appeal is disposed of with no order as to costs.