Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 2]

Chattisgarh High Court

Smt. Rekha Gawal vs State Of Chhattisgarh 12 Wpc/1245/2018 ... on 2 May, 2018

Author: Sanjay K. Agrawal

Bench: Sanjay K. Agrawal

                                            1

                                                                            NAFR

              HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

                                WPC No. 1237 of 2018

        1. Smt. Rekha Gawal, Wd/o Late Ashwani Gawal, aged about 31 years, R/o
            431/26, Hospital Ward, Ward No. 29, Pachripara, Near Menonite Church,
           Infront of Manas Bhawan, Durg, District Durg (C.G.)

                                                                     ---- Petitioner

                                        Versus

     1. State Of Chhattisgarh through - Secretary, Department of School
        Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur
        (C.G.)

     2. Director, Directorate of School Education, Block-III, First Floor, Indrawati
        Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)

     3. District Education Officer, Durg, District Durg (C.G.)

                                                                  ---- Respondents

For Petitioner : Mr. Malay Shrivastava, Advocate. For Respondents / State : Mr. Arun Sao, Dy. Advocate General Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 02/05/18

1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that appeal preferred by the petitioner is pending consideration before respondent No.2 since 16.09.2017 who may be directed to consider and decide the same expeditiously.

2. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

3. Be that as it may, respondent No. 2 is directed to consider and dispose of the petitioner's appeal expeditiously preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order after hearing the parties.

2

4. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to cost(s).

SD/-

(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka