Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 1]

Patna High Court - Orders

Shiv Ranjan Kumar @ Shiv Ranjan Roy vs State Of Bihar & Anr on 4 April, 2016

Author: Dinesh Kumar Singh

Bench: Dinesh Kumar Singh

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                    Criminal Miscellaneous No.14752 of 2016
                       Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1434 Year- 2015 Thana -DARBHANGA COMPLAINT CASE
                                                      District- DARBHANGA
                   ======================================================
                   Shiv Ranjan Kumar @ Shiv Ranjan Roy, Son Sri Ram Lal Raut @ Ram Lal
                   Roy, Resident of Mohalla - Mithila Colony Nasriganj, P.S. Digha, District
                   - Patna.
                                                                        .... .... Petitioner/s
                                                    Versus
                   1. The State of Bihar.
                   2. Puja Rai W/o Sri Shiv Ranjan Kumar @ Shiv Ranjan Roy, Resident of
                      Mohalla - Mithila Colony, Nasriganj, P.S. Digha, District - Patna at
                      present D/o Late Anil Rai, Resident of village Kachhua Bhism Tol P.S.
                      Jale, District - Darbhanga.

                                                                    .... .... Opposite Party/s
                   ======================================================
                   Appearance :
                   For the Petitioner/s     :  Mr. Satyendra Prasad
                   For the Opposite Party/s   : Mr. Ajay Kumar-Ii(App)
                   ======================================================
                   CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR
                   SINGH
                   ORAL ORDER

02/   04-04-2016

Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State.

The petitioner being the husband of the complainant is apprehending his arrest in a complaint case wherein process has been directed to be issued after cognizance being taken for the offences punishable under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code.

The basic accusation is of torture.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner admits his marriage with the complainant and is ready to keep the complainant as wife with full Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.14752 of 2016 (2) dt.04-04-2016 2/3 dignity and honour, statement to that effect has been made in paragraph 15 of the petition, which reads as follows:-

"That the petitioner is ready to keep his wife with full dignity and respect according to his capacity."

It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that similar was the stand of the petitioner before the learned court below but the complainant failed to appear in spite of service of notice issued by the learned court below which gets reflected from the impugned order.

Considering the present stand of the petitioner, let the above named petitioner be released on provisional anticipatory bail for one year in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Darbhanga in connection with C.R. No. 1434 of 2015, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

Let the learned court below issue notice to the complainant on her appearance the petitioner will take the complainant to keep her as wife with full dignity and honour.

The provisional bail of the petitioner will be Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.14752 of 2016 (2) dt.04-04-2016 3/3 confirmed within one year by the learned court below in three eventualities:- (i) on substantial restoration of the matrimonial harmony; (ii) or if the complainant gets reluctant to reconcile the issue; and (iii) or if the complainant fails to appear before the learned court.

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) DKS/-

U           T