Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Calcutta High Court

Vodafone Essar East Ltd vs Shree Balasaria Construction Pvt. Ltd on 7 February, 2017

Author: I. P. Mukerji

Bench: I. P. Mukerji

                               GA No. 2081 of 2016
                                       with
                               AP No. 1550 of 2014
                        IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
                      ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION


                                                          Vodafone Essar East Ltd.
                                                                            Versus
                                              Shree Balasaria Construction Pvt. Ltd.


Before:
The Hon'ble Justice I. P. MUKERJI
Date: 7th February 2017

                                                                         Appearance:
                                                      Mr. Jishnu Saha, Sr. Advocate
                                                          Mr. Atish Ghosh, Advocate
                                                       Mr. Srinanda Bose, Advocate
                                                       Mr. Souvik Ghosh, Advocate
                                                                    for the petitioner
                                                  Mr. Moloy Kr. Ghosh, Sr. Advocate
                                                        Mr. Kumar Gupa, Advocate
                                                    Mr. Rajesh Kr. Ghosh, Advocate
                                                       Mr. Ramesh Dhara, Advocate
                                                                 for the respondent

The Court: Mr. Ghosh for the respondent very fairly submits that this application is unnecessary inasmuch as the arbitration proceedings commenced before coming into force of the amendments to the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. I accept Mr. Ghosh's submissions.

This application (GA No. 2081 of 2016) is disposed of with the above observation.

Let the section 34 application (AP No. 1550 of 2014) be upgraded so that it is listed within the first five "Arbitration Matters (Adjourned)" on and from 13th February 2017.

(I. P. MUKERJI, J.) R. Bose