Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 2]

Chattisgarh High Court

Mahendra Kumar Sahu vs Manohar Dhruv 52 Wa/785/2018 Sushil ... on 28 November, 2018

Bench: Ajay Kumar Tripathi, Parth Prateem Sahu

                                                                                             NAFR
                         HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
                                             WA No. 784 of 2018
               • Mahendra Kumar Sahu S/o Mansharam Sahu Aged About 48 Years (Revisionst)
                 R/o Village Bemetars, Tehsil Balodabazar, District Balodabazar Bhatapara
                 Chhattisgarh.
                                                                                      ---- Appellant
                                                    Versus
               1. Manohar Dhruv S/o Adhari Dhruv Aged About 41 Years R/o Village Bementra,
                  Tehsil Balodabazar, District Balodabazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.
               2. State of Chhattisgarh Through The Commissioner Raipur Division, Raipur
                  Chhattisgarh.
               3. Collector Tehsil Balodabazar, District Balodabazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.
               4. Sub Divisional Officer Tehsil Balodabazar, District Balodabazar Bhatapara
                  Chhattisgarh.
               5. Chief Municipal Officer Janpad Panchayat Tehsil Balodabazar, District
                  Balodabazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.
               6. Sammelal Sahu S/o Gopal Sahu Aged About 50 Years R/o Village Bemetars,
                  Tehsil Balodabazar, District Balodabazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.
                                                                                 ---- Respondents

_____________________________________________________________________ For Appellant : Shri Sudeep Johri, Advocate ______________________________________________________________________ Hon'ble Shri Ajay Kumar Tripathi, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Judgment on Board Per, Ajay Kumar Tripathi, Chief Justice 28.11.2018

1. Heard counsel for the Appellant.

2. If the interim order was not granted by the learned Single Judge against which the present appeal has been preferred, the writ application of the petitioner, who is private Respondent herein, would have became infructuous.

3. The appeal has no merit. It is dismissed.

                          Sd/-                                               Sd/-
                  (Ajay Kumar Tripathi)                            (Parth Prateem Sahu)
                      Chief Justice                                        Judge
Chandra