Gauhati High Court
Rajdeep Nath @ Rajdip Nath vs The State Of Assam And Anr on 3 March, 2020
Author: Ajit Borthakur
Bench: Ajit Borthakur
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010287202018
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Crl.Pet. 346/2019
1:RAJDEEP NATH @ RAJDIP NATH
S/O SHRI MADHAB CHANDRA NATH, R/O RAJA PUKHURI GAON, P.O.-
BATARHAT, P.S.-VIJAYNAGAR, DIST-KAMRUP(R), ASSAM, P/A-SURVEY,
AJANTA PATH, BYE LANE-4, HOUSE NO.7, GUWHATI-18
VERSUS
1:THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR.
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM
2:INDRAJEET CHAKRABORTY
S/O LATE ANIL CHAKRABORTY
INSPECTOR OF POLICE
CHIEF MINISTER'S SPECIAL VIGILANCE CELL
ASSAM
GUWAHATI-22
R/O ROSY APARTMENT
LAKHIMI NAGAR PATH
GUWAHATI-
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR N DUTTA
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM
Linked Case : Crl.Pet. 470/2019
1:BIDHAN SAIKIA
S/O LATE PANIRAM SAIKIA
R/O NAZIRAKHAT
SONAPUR
Page No.# 2/3
P.O.-SONAPUR
P.S.-SONAPUR
DIST. KAMRUP(M)
ASSAM
VERSUS
1:THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR.
THROUGH THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
ASSAM
2:INDRAJEET CHAKRABORTY
INSPECTOR OF POLICE
CHIEF MINISTER'S VIGILANCE CELL
DISPUR
GUWAHATI-6 (INFORMANT)
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR R CHAKRAVORTY
Advocate for the Respondent : PP
ASSAM
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT BORTHAKUR
ORDER
Date : 03-03-2020 Heard Mr. R. Chakravorty, learned counsel for the petitioner in Crl. Pet. 470/2019 as well as Mr. H. Das, learned counsel for the petitioner in Crl. Pet. 346/2019. Also heard Mr. D. Das, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam appearing for the State/respondent No. 1.
Mr. R. Chakravorty, learned counsel for the petitioner in Crl. Pet. 470/2019, has referred to the following judgments of the Hon'ble Supreme Court (i) Union of India Vs. Sukumar Pyne, reported in (1966) 2 SCR 34 (ii) Securities & Exchange Board of India Vs. Ajay Agarwal, reported in (2010) 3 SCC 765.
Mr. H. Das, learned counsel for the petitioner in Crl. Pet. 346/2019, has referred to the following judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court (i) R. Janakiraman Vs. State represented by Inspector of Police, CBI, SPE, Madras, reported in (2006) 1 SCC 697.
Hearing concluded.
Page No.# 3/3 Order reserved.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant