Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 4]

Chattisgarh High Court

M/S Bastar Oil Mills And Ors vs State Of M.P. And Ors. 24 Wpc/1850/2018 ... on 29 August, 2018

Author: Prashant Kumar Mishra

Bench: Prashant Kumar Mishra

                                     1

                                                                     NAFR

           HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

                          WP No. 3177 of 1999

   1. M/s Bastar Oil Mills & Industries Limited, a company duly incorporated
      under the Indian Companies Act, 1956 having its registered office at
      Kurandi Road, Jagdalpur, District Bastar

   2. Prathvi Raj Agrawal, aged about 50 years, son of late Kundanlal
      Agrawal, Managing Director and Share Holder M/s Bastar Oil Mills &
      Industries Limited, R/o Brindavan Colony, Jagdalpur, District Bastar
      (MP)

                                                            ---- Petitioner

                                 Versus

   1. State Of Madhya Pradesh, through the Principal Secretary to the
      Government of Madhya Pradesh, Department of Forest, Vallabh
      Bhawan, Bhopal (MP)

   2. The Additional Principal Chief Conservator of Forest (Production and
      Industry) Government of Madhya Pradesh, Satpuda Bhawan, Bhopal

   3. Conservator of Forest, Sarguja, Jagdalpur, Kanker

   4. Madhya Pradesh Laghu Vanopaj Vyapar Avam Vikas Sahkari Sangh
      Maryadit, through its Managing Director, 38/B, Vikas Bhawan,
      Maharanapratap Nagar, Bhopal.

                                                          ---- Respondent

For Petitioners : Shri Ashish Shrivastava, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Shri AS Kachhawaha, Additional AG.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 29/08/2018

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in view of the order passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in SLP(Civil) No.6/2000, nothing survives in this matter, as the cause of action has been 2 rendered infructuous.

2. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.

Sd/-

Judge (Prashant Kumar Mishra) Barve