Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 29]

Chattisgarh High Court

Abhishek Jain vs State Of Chhattisgarh 21 Wpc/2681/2018 ... on 24 October, 2018

Author: Prashant Kumar Mishra

Bench: Prashant Kumar Mishra

                                                                    NAFR

            HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

                         WPC No. 2951 of 2018

     • Abhishek Jain S/o Shri Abhay Kumar Jain, Aged About 34 Years
       R/o Village - Sunaiti ,police Station Sultanganj, District Raisen
       (M.P.) Present Address - House No.292, Sector A, Nehru School
       Gulley, New Ashok Garden Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh

                                                            ---- Petitioner

                                 Versus

     1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, Bilaspur, District
        Bilaspur Chhattisgarh

     2. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Sub Divisional Officer (R)
        Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

     3. President, Bengalee Association, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh Through
        Amar Sarkar, Sarkar Villa, Near Kalchuri School, Paramount
        Gulley, Hemu Nagar, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh

     4. Ramesh, Proprietor, Private Mina Bazar, present Address -
        Kalibadi Temple Ground, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh

                                                        ---- Respondents

For Petitioner Shri Achyut Tiwari, Advocate For Respondent-State Ms. Astha Shukla, PL Hon'ble Justice Mr. Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 24/10/2018

1. The dispute raised in the writ petition appears to be against the respondent No.3, which is a private body not amenable to writ jurisdiction of this Court. If the said respondent has obtained the advance amount of Rs.40,000/- from the petitioner by playing fraud or otherwise, the remedy for the petitioner lies to approach the jurisdictional Civil Court or the Criminal Court, as the case may be.

2. The petitioner may work out his remedy before the jurisdictional Civil or Criminal Court.

3. The writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/-

Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge Nirala