Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Lodha Developers Private Limited vs Santosh Balwant Kawali And Anr on 26 July, 2024

Author: Madhav J. Jamdar

Bench: Madhav J. Jamdar

                                                                    908-S-2428-2012.doc


 Arjun

              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                  ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

                               SUIT NO.2428 OF 2012

 Lodha Developers Private Ltd.                          ...Plaintiff
      Versus
 Manohar B. Kawali & Anr.                               ...Defendants
                                      WITH
                               SUIT NO.2429 OF 2012

 Lodha Developers Private Ltd.                          ...Plaintiff
        Versus
 Dilip Balwant Kawali & Anr.                            ...Defendants
                                      WITH
                               SUIT NO.2563 OF 2012

 Lodha Developers Private Ltd.                          ...Plaintiff
       Versus
 Santosh Balwant Kawali & Anr.                          ...Defendants
 ______________________________________________________________

 Ms. Ketki Gadkari, for the Plaintiff, in all Suits.
 Ms. Sirat N. Khan i/b Mr. Kamalesh Tiwari, for the Defendant No.1, in
 all Suits.
 _______________________________________________________________

                               CORAM: MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.

DATED: 26 JULY 2024 P.C.:

1. Heard Ms. Gadkari, learned Counsel for the Plaintiff and Ms. Khan, learned Counsel for Defendant No.1.
2. Ms. Gadkari, learned Counsel states that by Order dated 5th March 2020 this Court has granted a period of 8 weeks to record the 1 ::: Uploaded on - 26/07/2024 ::: Downloaded on - 08/08/2024 21:22:56 ::: 908-S-2428-2012.doc evidence of Plaintiff's Witness No.1. However, she submits that due to COVID-19 pandemic further steps could not be taken. She states that accordingly the period granted by Order dated 5th March 2020 be extended. Ms. Khan, learned Counsel states that the period be extended by 12 weeks.
3. Accordingly, time granted by Order dated 5th March 2020 to record the evidence of the Plaintiff's Witness No.1 is extended by a period of 12 weeks from the date the Commissioner holds the first meeting.

[MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.] 2 ::: Uploaded on - 26/07/2024 ::: Downloaded on - 08/08/2024 21:22:56 :::