Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 1]

National Green Tribunal

Grampanchayat Urali Devachi vs Pune Municipal Corporation Through The ... on 19 July, 2019

  BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL, WESTERN ZONE
                    BENCH, PUNE
                          Original Application No. 52/2015(WZ)
                                           And
                       Original Application No. 195(THC)/2016(WZ)
                                           And
                       Original Application No. 196(THC)/2016(WZ)
                               M.A. 439/2016 (CA 178/2015)
In the matter of:

         Bhagwan Bhadale & Anr. V/s The Commissioner, PMC & Ors.
                                    And
   Grampanchayat Urali Devachi & Anr. V/s Pune Municipal Corporation & Ors.
                                    And
      Vineet Dhanda V/s The Chief Secretary, State of Maharashtra & Ors

CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.P.WANGDI, JUDICIAL MEMBER
      HON'BLE DR. NAGIN NANDA, EXPERT MEMBER

Application No.52/2015
Present:       Applicant/Appellant                 :     Mr. Asim Sarode Adv
               Respondent No.1                     :     Mr. P.Narayan Adv
                                                         Mr.Swapnil Sonawane Adv
                                                         Ms. Niharika Shivade Adv
                Respondent No.2                          Ms.Supriya Dangare Adv


Application No.195(THC)/2016
Present:       Applicant/Appellant                 :     Mr Asim Sarode Adv
               Respondent No.1                     :     Mr. P.S.Suryawanshi Adv
               Respondent No.6                     :     Ms Manasi Joshi Adv

Application No.196(THC)/2016
Present:       Applicant/Appellant                 :     Mr Asim Sarode Adv
               Respondent No.3                     :     Mr. P.S.Suryawanshi Adv
               Respondent No.5                     :     Ms Manasi Joshi Adv

Date and
                                           Orders of the Tribunal
Remarks
Suppl. Cause
List                   By order dated July 17,2018 the Municipal Commissioner, Pune
Items No.2-4
July 19, 2018
                 Municipal Corporation (PMC) was directed to show cause as to why action

                 under Section 26 read with Section 28 of the National Green Tribunal Act,

                 2010 should not be instituted against them having failed to comply with the

                 order of the Tribunal, passed on 18th November, 2017. It had been

                 reminded that the said order had been passed as a consequence of a

                 prolonged deliberation with the PMC and the other stakeholders. Substance

                 of the directions related inter-alia, to disposal of the legacy waste by eco-

                 friendly bio-remediation process and use of the sites at Urali Devachi and

                 Fursungi villages as sanitary landfill for disposal of inert waste to its full

                 capacity until the period of authorisation as stipulated by the Maharashtra




                                          Page 1 of 4
                 Pollution Control Board (MPCB) was over.
Suppl. Cause
List
Items No.2-4          It had been also stated on behalf of the PMC during the proceedings
July 19, 2018

                that the legacy waste lying at the sites roughly amounted to 2.3lakhs MT

                could be handled and disposed of in eco-friendly manner by employing bio-

                remediation process and, thereafter it can be gainfully used for disposal of

                inert waste like rejects from bio-remediation process and those generated

                within the extended limits of the PMC quantified at 40MT per day as

                authorized by the MPCB and, after exhausting its capacity at the end of the

                authorised period it would be scientifically capped and used for gardening

                and such other recreational purposes for common good of the local citizens.


                      It was also submitted that the Corporation will come up with an action

                plan to deal with the incoming waste by handling the mixed waste at the site

                on a reducing scale to eliminate the incoming waste within a timeframe. The

                details of the proposed action of the PMC will be evident from the order

                recorded on 18th November, 2017. It was stated on behalf of the PMC that

                an action plan will be presented before us on or before the 15th December,

                2017. We had accordingly directed so with further direction to serve copies

                of the action plan to the MPCB and other contending parties.


                      On July, 11, 2018 we had noticed that the action plan for disposal of

                legacy waste had not been placed except to state Expression of Interest

                (EoI) had been called for on 19th June, 2018. We were taken aback to note

                that the action plan required to be presented on 15th December, 2017 had

                not been filed. When we asked of the learned Counsel for the PMC on this,

                in his answer it was curiously stated that the action plan had been set out in

                the affidavit filed by the Municipal Commissioner which also is his show-

                cause to the Notice issued to him.


                      On a perusal of the affidavits we find it to be quite vague and

                deficient of materials required of an action plan for such a critical subject.

                This in our opinion, reflects gross negligence, indifference and casualness



                                         Page 2 of 4
 Suppl. Cause    on the part of PMC in dealing with such a serious matter even when it is
List
Items No.2-4
July 19, 2018
                being monitored judicially.


                        In M.C.Mehta Vs Union of India, 2004 (12) SCC 118           it has been

                held that     "if the regulatory authorities either connive or act negligently by

                not taking prompt action to prevent or avoid or control the damage to

                environment, natural resources and peoples' health and property, the

                principles of accountability for restoration and compensation have to be

                applied."


                        The present case is a classic example where a public body has failed

                to perform its bounden duty cast upon it by the statutes under which it has

                been created.


                        The Municipal Commissioner is not present but in his place the

                Additional Municipal Commissioner has appeared. As noted earlier, the

                affidavit filed on 17.7.2018 is said to be in compliance of the order dated

                November 18, 2017 which is also stated to be a show cause filed on behalf

                of the Municipal Commissioner to the Notice issued under Section 26 read

                with Section 28 of the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010.


                        The explanation given in the affidavit is not sufficient to satisfy us as

                to why the PMC has failed to comply with the directions that were based on

                their own statements.


                        We, however, for the moment, do not intend to pass any order on

                this,    as Mr. Rajendra Nimbalkar, IAS, the Additional Municipal

                Commissioner, PMC prays that the Municipal Corporation may be granted

                at least two (2) months within which all actions as directed vide order dated

                November, 18, 2017 shall be complied with, particularly, in dealing with the

                legacy waste. Considering submissions of the Additional Municipal

                Commissioner, we allow time of two months as prayed for.


                        However, the prayer seeking exemption of payment of penalty of



                                          Page 3 of 4
 Suppl. Cause    ₹2Crores is not acceptable and, therefore, we direct that a Bank Guarantee
List
Items No.2-4
July 19, 2018
                of ₹2Crores be deposited in the account of the MPCB as performance

                guarantee.


                      The PMC shall file an interim report after one month from today on

                the progress and status of the work. We further clarify that the action sought

                for from the PMC shall not be confined only to the legacy waste but shall

                also include other aspects dealing with the MSW as prescribed under the

                MSW Rules, 2016.


                      The report shall be filed within time stipulated.


                      List on 20th September, 2018, but interim report shall be filed on 20th

                August, 2018.


                      List on 20th September, 2018.

                                                                ...................................,
                                                                Justice S.P.Wangdi, JM
                                                                                  19-7-2018




                                                                 ....................................

Dr.Nagin Nanda, EM 19-7-2018 hkk Page 4 of 4