Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Ramakant & Ors vs State & Ors on 6 July, 2017

Author: Vijay Bishnoi

Bench: Vijay Bishnoi

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
              S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6019 / 2006
1.    Ramakant S/o Shri Ratanlal, Aged 52 years, By caste Gurjar,
2.    Girdhari Lal S/o Shri Bhuralal, Aged 52 years, By caste Baldi,
3.    Gopal Krishan S/o Shri Raghunath, Aged 73 years, By caste
      Lakhotia,
4.    Bhagwan Das S/o Shri Nathulal, Aged 42 years, By caste
      Verma,
5.    Vallabhdas S/o Shri Bal Krishan, Aged 54 years, By caste
      Kabara,
6.    Purshottam S/o Shri Sunderlal, Aged 76 years, By caste
      Kabara,
7.    Jankivallabh S/o Shri Raghunath, Aged 68 years, By caste
      Lakhotia,
8.    Jaiprakash Sen S/o Shri Goverdhan, Aged 29 years, By caste
      Kumawat,
9.    Pramod Kumar S/o Shri Shyamlal, Aged 54 years, By caste
      Kumawat,
10.   Chandra Kant S/o Shri Arjun Lal, Aged 44 years, By caste
      Painter,
11.   Rajesh S/o Shri Fatehlal Purohit, Aged 30 years, By caste
      Paliwal,
12.   Giriraj S/o Shri Ghanshyam, Aged 35 years, By caste
      Lakhotiya,
13.   Satyanarayan S/o Shri Motilal, Aged 40 years, By caste
      Nagda,
14.   Giriraj S/o Shri Nathulal, Aged 40 years, By caste Verma,
15.   Paresh S/o Shri Rasiklal, Aged 28 years, By caste Mehta,
16.   Rasik Lal S/o Shri Jayanti Lal, Aged 39 years, By caste
      Mehta,
17.   Ramesh Chandra S/o Shri Purushottam, Aged 46 years,         By
      caste Kabra,
18.   Shivshankar @ Shiv Kumar S/o Shri Fatehlal, Aged 46 years,
      By caste Purohit
      All residents of Vanmali Temple, Nathdwara, Tehsil
      Nathdwara, District Rajsamand (Raj.) through the petitioner
      No.5.
                                                      ----Petitioners
                               Versus
                                (2 of 2)
                                                         [CW-6019/2006]

1.    The State of Rajasthan through the Secretary, Department of
      Devasthan, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2.    The District Collector, Rajsamand.
3.    The Land Acquisition Officer (Sub Divisional          Officer),
      Nathdwara, District Rajsamand (Rajasthan)
4.    The Chief Executive Officer, Shree Nathdwara Temple Board,
      Nathdwara, District Rajsamand (Rajasthan)
5.    Goswami Shri Tilkayatji Rakeshji Maharaj Saheb, President,
      Shree Nathdwara Temple Board, Nathdwara, District
      Rajsamand (Rajasthan)
                                                  ----Respondents
_____________________________________________________
For Petitioners       : Mr. Chaitanya Gehlot
For Respondent No.4 : Mr. Deepak Chandak for
                        Mr. M.S. Singhvi, Sr. Advocate
_____________________________________________________
             HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI

Judgment / Order 06/07/2017 Learned counsel for the petitioners wants to withdraw this writ petition.

In view of the above submission, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

(VIJAY BISHNOI)J. Abhishek Kumar S.No.134