Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Central Administrative Tribunal - Allahabad

Abhaya Mishra vs Sr Shitala Prasad Pandey Spo And Others on 30 November, 2021

                               CCP No. 330/00246/2018 in OA No.1526/2015




                                                            Open Court


              CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
                    ALLAHABAD BENCH
                        ALLAHABAD.

          Allahabad, this the 30th day of November, 2021

Civil Misc. Contempt Petition No.330/00246/2018
in
Original Application No. 330/01526/2015

Hon'ble Mr. Tarun Shridhar, Member (Administrative)
Hon'ble Ms. Pratima K Gupta, Member (Judicial)

Abhaya Mishra, S/o Shri Aswani Kumar Mishra, R/o Village
Aandeora, Post Malhawar, District Basti.

                                                           . . .Petitioner
By Advocate : Shri A.K. Dave

                             VERSUS

     1. Shitala Prasad Pandey, Superintendent of Post Office, Basti
        Division, Basti.
     2. Sanjay Singh, Post Master General, Gorakhpur Region,
        Gorakhpur.

                                                        . . .Respondents
By Advocate : Shri L.M. Singh

                             ORDER

By Hon'ble Mr. Tarun Shridhar, Member (Administrative) :

Heard Shri A.K. Dave, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri L.M. Singh, learned counsel for the respondents.
i.

2. At the outset, learned counsel for the respondents submits that the order passed by this Tribunal in OA No.1526 of 2015 has been fully complied with in letter and spirit. He further submits that he has filed an affidavit of compliance in this case. Therefore, he prays that the contempt proceedings may be closed. Page 1 of 2

CCP No. 330/00246/2018 in OA No.1526/2015

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner expresses his agreement and satisfaction.

4. In view of the above, the contempt proceedings are closed. Notices issued to the respondents are discharged.

5. All the MAs pending in this contempt petition are disposed of as having become infructuous.

       (Pratima K Gupta)                       (Tarun Shridhar)
        Member(Judicial)                      Member(Administrative)



RKM/




                                                                Page 2 of 2