Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Gauhati High Court

Rahul Hi Rise Ltd. And Anr vs The State Of Assam And 5 Ors on 17 March, 2020

Author: Prasanta Kumar Deka

Bench: Prasanta Kumar Deka

                                                                 Page No.# 1/3

GAHC010052082020




                       THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
  (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                          Case No. : WP(C) 2031/2020

         1:RAHUL HI RISE LTD. AND ANR.
         A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 HAVING
         ITS REGD. OFFICE AT 30H/1 B.B. SENGUPTA ROAD, KOLKATA-700034.

         2: ABHIJIT MAJUMDAR
          S/O. LT. BHUPENDRA NARAYAB MAJUMDAR
          30H/1 B.B. SENGUPTA ROAD
          KOLKATA-700034. ONE OF THE DIRECTORS OF THE PETITIONER NO.1
         COMPANY

         VERSUS

         1:THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS.
         REP. BY THE COMM. AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, HOME DEPTT.,
         DISPUR, GUWAHATI, ASSAM.

         2:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE
          STATE OF ASSAM
          HAVING HIS OFFICE AT ASSAM POLICE HEAD QUARTERS
          ULUBARI
          GUWAHATI-781007.

         3:THE SUPDT. OF POLICE
          BARPETA
          DIST. BARPETA
         ASSAM.

         4:STATE BANK OF INDIA
         TOLLYGUNGE CIRCULAR ROAD BRANCH
          34
         T.C. ROAD
          KOLKATA
          PIN-700053
          REP. BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER.
                                                                                 Page No.# 2/3


             5:THE OFFICER IN CHARGE
              BARPETA ROAD POLICE STATION
              BARPETA
             ASSAM.

             6:STATE BANK OF INDIA
              SIRITI MUCHIPARA BRANCH
              423-D MOTILAL GUPTA ROAD (MUCHIPARA)
              KOLKATA-700082
              REP. BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER

Advocate for the Petitioner    : MR. K AGARWAL

Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM




                                         BEFORE
              THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASANTA KUMAR DEKA
                                          ORDER

17.03.2020 Heard Mr. K. Agarwal, the learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. A. K. Gupta, the learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. G. Pegu, the learned Government Counsel, Assam for the respondent Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 5.

The petitioner is aggrieved for continuation of the frozen status of the Bank Accounts in the respondent State Bank of India which are standing against its name.

Let notice be issued.

As hereinabove stated, Mr. Pegu accepts notice on behalf of the respondent Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 5. Necessary extra copies be served on the learned counsel for the respondents.

The petitioner shall take steps on the respondent Nos. 4 and 6 by way registered post with A.D within a period of three days from today.

Page No.# 3/3 Notice is made returnable on 13.05.2020.

List this matter along with WP(C) No. 118/2012 (since disposed of on 01.10.2018).

JUDGE Comparing Assistant