Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Himachal Pradesh High Court

Madan Mohan vs State Of Himachal Pradesh And Another on 2 December, 2022

Bench: Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Ajay Mohan Goel

    IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

                                          CWP No.8376 of 2022.




                                                                        .

                                          Date of decision: 02.12.2022.


    Madan Mohan                                                .....Petitioner.





                                   Versus
    State of Himachal Pradesh and another
                                      .....Respondents.




    Coram
    The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge.

    The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge.

    Whether approved for reporting?1 No
    For the Petitioner             :      Mr. Vikas Rajput, Advocate.


    For the Respondents:                   Mr.      Ashok       Sharma,
                                           Advocate     General    with
                                           Mr. Rajinder Dogra, Senior
                                           Additional         Advocate




                                           General, Mr. Vinod Thakur,
                                           Additional         Advocate





                                           General,    Mr.   Bhupinder
                                           Thakur, Deputy Advocate
                                           General    and   Mr.   Rajat





                                           Chauhan, Law Officer.


    Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge (Oral)

Notice. Mr. Rajinder Dogra, learned Senior Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.

1

Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?Yes ::: Downloaded on - 02/12/2022 20:33:41 :::CIS 2

2. The petitioner eversince from his appointment is serving in difficult sub cadre area of Chhota Bhangal, .

District Kangra, H.P. since 2016 and, therefore, in terms of the Comprehensive Guiding Principles-2013, is entitled to be transferred to one of the soft stations of his choice.

3. The petitioner has already filed a representation (Annexure P-3) wherein he has opted for the following stations:- r "1. GPS Nagoon.

2. GPS Lulani.

3. GPS Garthera.

4. GPS Dharar.

5. GPS Phatahar."

4. Accordingly, we deem it appropriate to dispose of this petition by directing the respondents to consider and decide the representation preferred by the petitioner within a period of two weeks from today and thereafter consequential orders of transfer be passed within a period of next one week. Ordered accordingly.

5. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.

::: Downloaded on - 02/12/2022 20:33:41 :::CIS 3

6. For compliance, to come up on 23.12.2022.

.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge 2nd December, 2022.

    (krt)



                 r         to









                                    ::: Downloaded on - 02/12/2022 20:33:41 :::CIS