Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 2]

Kerala High Court

State Of Kerala vs Geevarghese Chacko on 29 July, 2008

Author: Pius C.Kuriakose

Bench: Pius C.Kuriakose

       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

LA.App..No. 1299 of 2008()


1. STATE OF KERALA
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. GEEVARGHESE CHACKO,
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :GOVERNMENT PLEADER

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice PIUS C.KURIAKOSE

 Dated :29/07/2008

 O R D E R
                     PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, J.
                 ----------------------------------
                   L.A.A.NO. 1299 of 2008
                 ----------------------------------
           Dated this the 29th      day of July , 2008

                           JUDGMENT

This appeal relates to the acquisition of 1.20. Ares of land for the purpose of Kottiyam Branch Canal pursuant to a notification under Section 4(1) notification dated 22.12.1987. The Land Acquisition Officer awarded land value at the rate of Rs.7082/- per Are. The court below relying on the judgment in L.A.R.Nos.347/1989, 565/1988 and 355/1989 re-fixed the land value at Rs.7,082/- per Are. It is seen from the judgment that the learned Subordinate Judge proceeded on the basis that the judgments relied on had attained finality. The Registry reports to me that the judgments have attained finality. There was no appeal against the judgment in L.A.R. 347/1989. The appeal which had been preferred against the L.A.R. Nos.565/1988, 355/1989 were L.A.A.397/1994, 458/1994 respectively. Both those appeals have been dismissed by a Division Bench of this court confirming the land value refixed by the reference court.

Under the above circumstances, I do not find any warrant L.A.A. No.1299/2008 2 for interfering with the judgment of the reference court. The appeal fails and the same will stand dismissed.

PIUS C. KURIAKOSE JUDGE dpk