Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Central Information Commission

Mr.Sachin Sapra vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 26 July, 2013

                   Central Information Commission
Room No.307, II Floor, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New 
                                Delhi­110066
           Telefax:011­26180532 & 011­26107254 website­cic.gov.in

                  Appeal: No. CIC/SG/A/2012/001293/DS

Appellant /Complainant        :      Shri Sachin Sapra, Delhi 
Public Authority              :     South Delhi Municipal 
Corporation, Delhi 
                              ( Shri S.K. Bhatia, AE(B), Sh. Naveen 
Verma, CE)

Date of Hearing               :     26 July  2013 
Date of Decision              :     26 July  2013 
  
Facts:­ 

1. In   pursuance   of   show   cause   notice   issued   vide  Commission's   order   no.   CIC/SG/A/2012/001293/19225   dated   12  June   2012,   matter   was   heard   today.   Former   CPIO   Shri   Naveen  Verma appeared before the Commission and stated that the RTI  application dated  17 January 2012 originally was received  by  the then CPIO Shri Navrang Singh who forwarded the same to the  holder of information namely, Shri Ashish Sharma, EE(B) - I/WZ  on 18 January 2012.  However as per record it appears that no  information was received from the deemed CPIO. Meanwhile the  then CPIO Shri Singh was transferred out and Shri Verma took  over as SE - I/WZ on 2 March 2012.

2. Meanwhile the applicant filed appeal dated 19 March 2012  before   the   CIC   who   remanded   the   matter   back   to   the   first  appellate authority. Subsequently information was provided by  the deemed CPIO EE (B) - I/WZ Shri Ashish Sharma vide letter  dated 20 April 2012 and the same was received on 23 April 2012  by the CPIO who in turn provided the requested information to  the   appellant   on   24   April   2012.   In   his   written   reply   Shri     Adjunct Appeal: No. CIC/SG/A/2012/001293/DS                Naveen   Verma   has   stated   that   the   RTI   application   remained  pending with Shri Ashish Sharma, EE (B) - I/WZ from 31 January  2012 up to 20 April 2012. (That in fact the information was  not held by him)

3. It   was   further   submitted   that   the   first   appellate  authority   vide   his   order   dated   23   May   2012   ruled     that   the  requested information was held by Maintenance branch and also  by Town Planning Department and directed the CPIO to transfer  the   RTI   application   within   15   days   to   them.   Accordingly   the  RTI   application   was   transferred   to   the   Town   Planning  Department  on 28 May 2012 by the then CPIO. Shri Verma also  stated   that   he   was   not   the   custodian   of   the   record   and   to  provide   the   requisite   information   he   had   to   depend   on   the  executive  engineers concerned  who were also the deemed  CPIOs  and also the holder of information.

4. It   is   noted   from   the   aforementioned   averments   of   Shri  Naveen Verma that finally the information was furnished by EE  (M) I on 6 June 2012 that the requested information  was not  held by him. As regards the CPIO (TP), it was stated that they  had   provided   information   held   by   them   to   the   appellant   vide  letter   dated   15   June   2012   and   29   June   2012.   A   perusal   of  letter   dated   29   June   2012   shows   that   the   Town   Planning  Department does not hold the survey reports as the survey of  roads   to   be   notified   was   conducted   by   the   zonal   office   and  therefore  the information  was held by the CPIO SE - I, West  zone. The appellant was provided with a copy of the resolution  no 55 dated 4 June 2012.

Decision notice

5. It   is   noted  from   the   above   that  to   date,   the   appellant  has not been provided with a copy of the survey reports that     Adjunct Appeal: No. CIC/SG/A/2012/001293/DS                were prepared by the officers/engineers of the West Zone, as  each   department/wing   of   the   Corporation   is   passing   on     the  buck   on   to   next   Department.   It   is   incomprehensible   that   a  major   policy   decision   was   arrived   at   pertaining   to   re­ notification   of   internal   roads   in   a   prominent   residential  colony   of   Delhi   namely   Rajouri   Garden   in   2007   when  computerization of records had become the norm. The plea taken  by the public authority is that the Maintenance Department who  undertook the survey passed  on all the records pertaining to  the survey  to the town Planning Department  without  retaining  even a photocopy and the receiving Department states that they  had never received the copies of the survey reports from the M 

- I Department, West Zone.

6. As holder of information i.e., Shri Ashish Sharma, EE(B)­ I/WZ   delayed   in   providing   information   to   the   appellant     (4  months delay) Show cause notice is issued to him to explain as  to why penalty shall not be imposed upon him u/s 20(1) of the  RTI Act, 2005. 

7. Shri   Ashish   Sharma,   EE(B)­I/WZ   is     required   to   give   a  written submission to the Commission within three weeks of the  receipt of the order of Commission.   He is directed to appear  on  27.9.2013 at  2.45 PM.

8. As per normal  office procedure, a composite office  note  is put up on file before the competent authority for obtaining  approval on important policy matters. Undoubtedly the subject  matter of the RTI application reflects a significant change in  policy on an important matter which impacts on the lives and  civic   conditions   of   large   number   of   citizens   residing   in  Rajouri   Garden   which   is   one   of   the   premier   residential  colonies of the Capital. The matter is also fairly recent and     Adjunct Appeal: No. CIC/SG/A/2012/001293/DS                Commission cannot accept any  argument  that takes support  of  plea   of loss of documents. Commission refers this matter to  the   Deputy   Commissioner,   Rajouri   Garden   New   Delhi     as   an  important   matter   concerning   this   colony   would   have   most  certainly   passed   through   the   office   of   the   concerned   Deputy  Commissioner   where   record   of   movement   would   be   maintained   ­  and also perhaps the original file itself ­ with directions to  ascertain   the   movement   of   this   file.   The   CPIO/office   of  Commissioner,   North   Delhi   Municipal   Corporation   is   also  directed to put in serious efforts to locate the file in which  approval of competent  authority was taken  for this important  policy matter. A copy of the RTI application is enclosed for  ready reference regarding the subject matter etc.

9. CPIO/EE(B­I)/WZ, Rajouri Gardaen will provide information  regarding   dispatch   of   Survey     Reports   to   TP   Dept.   to   the  appellant   and   also   bring   the   documents   holding   this  information before the Commission on the next date.

10. Commission   will   review   the   progress   in   the   matter   on  27.9.2013 at  2.45 PM.  

   

(Smt. Deepak Sandhu) Information Commissioner (DS) Authenticated true copy:

(T. K. Mohapatra) Dy. Secretary & Dy. Registrar Tel. No. 011­26105027 Copy to:­
1. Shri Sachin Sapra F­18 B Rajouri Gardaen    Adjunct Appeal: No. CIC/SG/A/2012/001293/DS                New Delhi­110027  
2. The CPIO Superintending Engineer(West Zone)­I/WZ South Delhi Municipal Corporation  West Zone, Zonal Office Bldg.,  Vishal Enclave, Rajouri Garden,  New Delhi­110027  
3. The CPIO  South Delhi Municipal Corporation West Zone, Zonal Office Building,  Vishal Enclave , Rajouri Garden New Delhi­110027 
4. Dy. Commissioner/West Zone  South Delhi Municipal Corporation  West Zone, Zonal Office Bldg.,  Vishal Enclave, Rajouri Garden,  New Delhi­110027
5. The CPIO O/o  the Commissioner South Delhi Municipal Corporation Dr. S.P.M. Civic Centre, Minto Road  New Delhi­110002      Adjunct Appeal: No. CIC/SG/A/2012/001293/DS