Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Vishnuvardhana vs R Rajeshwari on 12 January, 2017

Author: Aravind Kumar

Bench: Aravind Kumar

                          1

     IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

       DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2017

                       BEFORE

       THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR

     MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.3602/2010 (MV)

BETWEEN:

VISHNUVARDHANA
S/O VEERAKYATAIAH
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS
R/AT NO.1351, 10TH MAIN
VIJAYANAGARA
BANGALORE-40.
                                     ... APPELLANT

(BY SRI.K. HANUMANTHARAYAPPA, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.     SMT. R. RAJESHWARI
       W/O M.K. RAMANATH
       R/AT 157, 3RD CROSS
       10TH MAIN, MEI COLONY
       PEENYA, BANGALORE-58.

2.     MR. JOHN F.PINTO
       S/O AM PINTO, MAJOR
       NO.83, MOSQUE ROAD
       FRAZER TOWN
       BANGALORE-560 005.

3.     THE NATIONAL INSURANCE
       CO.LTD., DIVISION NO.IV
       NO.16, KUMARA KRUPA
                            2

      ROAD, NEAR SHIVANANDA
      CIRCLE, BANGALORE-01            ... RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI T.V.SATHISH, ADVOCATE FOR R-1;
    SMT. GOWHAR UNNISA, ADVOCATE FOR R-3;
    APPEAL AGAINST R-2 STANDS DISMISSED)

      THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF
MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT & AWARD DATED
10.02.2010 PASSED BY THE MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIM
TRIBUNAL, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES BANGALORE CITY
(SCCH-10) IN MVC NO.7946/2007 AND DIRECT THE 2ND
RESPONDENT TO PAY BY ALLOWING THIS APPEAL AND
ETC.,

     THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,
THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:


                      JUDGMENT

Statutory deposit as required under Section 173(1) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 is not deposited by appellant. Hence, appeal is not maintainable and it stands dismissed.

Sd/-

JUDGE *sp