Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 3]

Gauhati High Court

Amalendu Kumar Roy vs The State Of Assam And 3 Ors on 28 January, 2019

Author: Nelson Sailo

Bench: Nelson Sailo

                                                                           Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010125212014




                              THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
   (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                                 Case No. : WP(C) 3124/2014

            1:AMALENDU KUMAR ROY
            S/O- LT. RASAMOY ROY, PERMANENT R/O OF 1ST LINK ROAD, LANE NO.
            14, HOUSE NO. 29, P.S. - SILCHAR, P.O. - SILCHAR, DIST.- CACHAR, ASSAM.


            VERSUS

            1:THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS
            REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER and SECY., GOVT. OF ASSAM, SECONDARY
            EDUCATION DEPTT., DISPUR, GUWAHATI.

            2:THE DIRECTOR
             SECONDARY EDUCATION
             KAHILIPARA
             GHY- 19.

            3:DY. INSPECTOR SCHOOLS
             CACHAR
             SILCHAR.

            4:DR. SOIBAM HARIDAS SINGH
             I/C PRINCIPAL
             GOVT. GIRLS H.S. and M.P. SILCHAR
             P.O. and P.S.- SILCHAR
             DIST.- CACHAR
            ASSAM
             PIN- 788001

Advocate for the Petitioner   : MR.I ISLAM

Advocate for the Respondent : MR.A BHATTACHARYA
                                                                                   Page No.# 2/2

                                  BEFORE
                      HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NELSON SAILO

                                           ORDER

Date : 28-01-2019 None appears for the petitioners on call.

Mr. PP Dutta, the learned standing counsel, Secondary Education, appears for the respondent No. 4 and Mr. C Bhatacharjee, learned counsel appears for the respondent Nos. 1, 2 & 3.

At the outset, the learned counsel for the respondent No. 4 submits that the petitioner has challenged the appointment of the respondent No. 4 as the in-charge Principal of Govt. Girls Higher Secondary and Multipurpose School, Silchar.

During the pendency of the writ petition, the respondent No. 4 has since retired on 30.11.2018 and therefore, the writ petition has become infructuous.

Mr. T SK, the learned counsel for the petitioner agrees with the same.

In view of above, the writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant