Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 1]

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)

Rahul Deb Lahiri vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors on 15 May, 2013

Author: Debasish Kar Gupta

Bench: Debasish Kar Gupta

                                                                        1


300   15.05.13             W. P. 12921     (W)   of 2013

        akd
                           Rahul Deb Lahiri
                                  Vs.
                    The State of West Bengal & Ors.


                 Mr. Partha Sarathi Bhattacherjee,
                 Ms. Indrani Chakraborty,
                 Mr. R. I. Sardar.
                            ... for the petitioner.
                 Mr. Ashim Kumar Ganguly,
                 Mr. Sk. Joynal Abdin.
                            ... for the State.
                 Mr. Abhijit Gangopadhyay,
                 Ms. Supriya Debey.
                            ... for the SSC.



                             This writ application is filed by the petitioner
                      assailing the 'final wait-listed panel report' of
                      District - Malda for the post of non-teaching staff /
                      1st RLST(NT) 2010 prepared by the West Bengal
                      Central School Service Commission.
                             According to the petitioner, he obtained 10
                      marks towards academic qualifications as per the
                      guidelines issued by the Central Commission and,
                      therefore, the total marks obtained by him was
                      41.34. But according to the petitioner, in the above
                      report it was shown as 31.34.
                             Similarly the respondent no. 5 obtained

6.47, according to the above report, in Computer Typing and Computer Proficiency Test; but it was shown in the communication issued under the Right to Information Act as 8.47.

On the prayer made on behalf of respondent nos. 2, 3 and 4, the hearing of this matter stands adjourned to enable them to obtain instructions.

Let this matter appear in the Monthly Combined List of June, 2013 under the same heading.

Upon prima facie consideration of the allegations made by the petitioner and upon consideration of the 'final wait-listed panel report' of District - Malda for the post of non-teaching staff / 1st RLST(NT) 2010 prepared by the West Bengal Central School Service Commission as also prima facie upon consideration of the information supplied under the Right to Information Act, 2005 to the 2 petitioner, I find that the petitioner has made out a strong prima facie case. Therefore, the balance of convenience and inconvenience in favour of protecting his interest respondent no. 2 is restrained from making recommendation in respect of one post of Clerk till 30th June, 2013 or until further order/orders whichever is earlier.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order be supplied to the parties, if applied for, subject to compliance with all necessary formalities.

(DEBASISH KAR GUPTA, J.)