Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Sri.H.R.Shivashankar vs The State Of Karnataka on 18 February, 2022

Bench: Chief Justice, Suraj Govindaraj

                           -1-


IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

     DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2022

                        PRESENT

THE HON'BLE MR. RITU RAJ AWASTHI, CHIEF JUSTICE

                           AND

     THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ

     WRIT PETITION NO.20343 OF 2021 (GM-MMS)

BETWEEN:

SRI. H.R. SHIVASHANKAR
S/O RUDRAPPA
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
R/O AT N. PRATHAPREDDYNAGARA
HALAKUNDI POST
BELLARY DISTRICT-583102.
                                            ...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. KALEEMULLAH SHARIFF, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.     THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
       REP BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT
       VIDHANA SOUDHA
       DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI
       BENGALURU-560001


2.     THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT
       OF KARNATAKA
       DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRIES
       VIKAS SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560001

3.     THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT
       OF KARNATAKA
       DEPARTMENT OF FORESTS
       VIDHANA SOUDHA
       BENGALURU-560001.

4.     THE CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS
       BELLARY CIRCLE, MOTI CIRCLE
                              -2-


     BELLARY-583101

5.   THE DEPUTY CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS
     BELLARY SUB-DIVISION
     II GATE, NEAR ZOO
     BELLARY-583101

6.   THE RANGE FOREST OFFICER
     BELLARY DIVISION
     BELLARY-583101

7.   THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
     BELLARY DISTRICT
     OPPOSITE TO RAILWAY STATION
     BELLARY-583101

8.   THE DIRECTOR
     DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND GEOLOGY
     KHANIJA BHAVAN, RACE COURSE ROAD
     BENGALURU-560001

9.   THE SENIOR GEOLOGIST (M)
     DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND GEOLOGY
     II GATE, BELLARY-583101

                                             ... RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. VANI.H, AGA)

     THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND
227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE
RESPONDENTS 8 AND 9 TO CONSIDER AND DISPOSE OF THE
REPRESENTATION    DATED     31.07.2021  PRODUCED     AS
ANNEXURE-F FOR GRANT OF MURRAM QUARRY IN RESPECT OF
REMAINING 5.00 ACRES OF LAND SITUATE AT HALADAHALLI
VILLAGE, BELLARY TALUK AND DISTRICT BY ISSUING A WRIT
OF MANDAMUS AND ETC.

    THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,
SURAJ GOVINDARAJ J MADE THE FOLLOWING:

                          ORDER

1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking the following reliefs:

i. Direct the respondents 8 and 9 to consider and dispose of the representation dated 31.07.2021 produced as Annexure-"F" for grant of Murram -3- Quarry in respect of remaining 5.00 acres of land situate at Haladahalli Village, Bellary Taluk and District by issuing a writ of mandamus.
ii. Issue such other writ, order or direction this Hon'ble Court deems necessary, in the circumstances of the case, interest of justice and equity.

2. The contention of the petitioner is that the petitioner had applied for grant of 10 acres of land for murram quarry, however, only 5 acres had been granted.

3. Smt.Vani H., learned Additional Government Advocate submits that in the earlier round of litigation in W.P.No.33159/2016, the petitioner had restricted his claim only to 5 acres and as such, 5 acres had been granted.

4. Sri.Kaleemullah Shariff, learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the said fact and contends that the petitioner has applied for grant of another 5 acres of land, which had not been granted.

5. We have perused the order dated 15.04.2019 passed in W.P.No.33159/2016 where the petitioner has categorically restricted his claim to 5 acres as recorded -4- in Para 6 of the said order and thereafter, this Court has directed the respondents to grant 5 acres of land to the petitioner as recorded in Para 7. When the petitioner himself has restricted his claim to 5 acres, the question of further grant of 5 acres would not arise.

6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed.

Sd/-

CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/-

JUDGE Prs*