Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 1]

Gujarat High Court

Ministry Of Railway vs Maniben Mohanbhai Patel & on 24 July, 2012

Author: D.H.Waghela

Bench: D.H.Waghela

  
	 
	 MINISTRY OF RAILWAY,UNION OF INDIA THRO DEDICATED FREIGHT....Applicant(s)V/SMANIBEN MOHANBHAI PATEL
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	

 
 


	 


	C/MCA/272/2013
	                                                                    
	                           ORDER

 

 


 
	  
	  
		 
			 

IN
			THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
		
	

 


 


 


MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION
(FOR EXTENTION) NO. 272 of 2013
 
	  
	  
		 
			 

In
			SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.  3797 of 2012
		
	

 


 


 

================================================================
 


MINISTRY OF RAILWAY,UNION
OF INDIA THRO DEDICATED FREIGHT....Applicant(s)
 


Versus
 


MANIBEN MOHANBHAI PATEL  &
 11....Opponent(s)
 

================================================================
 

Appearance:
 

MR
RAVI KARNAVAT, ADVOCATE for the Applicant(s) No. 1
 

GOVERNMENT
PLEADER for the Opponent(s) No. 12
 

MR
SAURABH G AMIN, ADVOCATE for the Opponent(s) No. 1 - 10
 

================================================================
 


	 
		  
		 
		  
			 
				 

CORAM:
				
				
			
			 
				 

HONOURABLE
				MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA
			
		
		 
			 
				 

 

				
			
			 
				 

and
			
		
		 
			 
				 

 

				
			
			 
				 

HONOURABLE
				MR.JUSTICE G.B.SHAH
			
		
	

 


 				      Date :
22/02/2013
 


 

 


ORAL ORDER

(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA) The petitioner authorities have sought extension of time-limit by six months so as to enable them to disburse payments to the families affected by the project. Learned counsel Mr.Ravi Karnavat, appearing for the petitioners, fairly conceded that by order dated 24.7.2012 in the main SCA No.3797 of 2012 and allied matters, only an observation was made for early conclusion of the proceedings under section 20F of the Railways Act; and no time-limit or dead-line was fixed. Therefore, there is no question of extending any time-limit. It is, however, desirable that the proceedings, as aforesaid, are concluded expeditiously and the project-affected-people receive their dues as early as practicable. With these observations, the application is dismissed.

Sd/-				Sd/-	
 


(D.H.WAGHELA, J.)       
     (G.B.SHAH, J.) 

 


(KMGThilake)
 


	 


	Page
	  2
	of   2