Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Delhi High Court - Orders

Coral Drugs Private Limited vs Union Of India Others & Ors on 12 October, 2022

Author: Rajiv Shakdher

Bench: Rajiv Shakdher

                            $~39
                            *    IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

                                   CM APPL. 44151/2022 in
                            +      W.P.(C) 7861/2021

                                   CORAL DRUGS PRIVATE LIMITED            ..... Petitioner
                                                Through: Ms Ekta Kumari, Adv.

                                                        versus

                                   UNION OF INDIA OTHERS & ORS.             ..... Respondents
                                                 Through: Ms Suhani Mathur and Mr Akshay
                                                          Saxena, Advs. for R-2 to 4.

                                   CORAM:
                                   HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER
                                   HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
                                                 ORDER

% 12.10.2022 [Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)] CM No. 44151/2022

1. The substantive prayer made in the captioned application reads as follows:

"(a) To allow the application for impleading Commissioner, CGST Sonepat, Commissionerate- Rohtak, Division- Sonepat, Range 25, Sonepat as Respondent No. 5 and Goods and Services Tax Network (GSTN) as Respondent No.6 and amended memo of parties be taken on record."

2. Issue notice.

2.1. Ms Suhani Mathur accepts notice on behalf of the contesting respondents i.e., respondent nos.2 to 4.

W.P.(C) 7861/2021 page 1 of 2 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:VIPIN KUMAR RAI Signing Date:27.10.2022 14:57:26

3. Ms Mathur says that in view of the prayer made in the application and given the reasons for moving the same, she does not oppose the prayer made in the application being allowed.

4. Accordingly, the prayer made in the application is allowed.

5. The amended memo of parties is taken on record.

6. The application is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

RAJIV SHAKDHER, J TARA VITASTA GANJU, J OCTOBER 12, 2022 aj Click here to check corrigendum, if any W.P.(C) 7861/2021 page 2 of 2 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:VIPIN KUMAR RAI Signing Date:27.10.2022 14:57:26