Kerala High Court
Sajeevu vs The State Of Kerala on 10 July, 2019
Author: B.Sudheendra Kumar
Bench: B.Sudheendra Kumar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR
WEDNESDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF JULY 2019 / 19TH ASHADHA, 1941
Bail Appl..No.4955 of 2019
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN MP 4667/2019 of JUDICIAL
MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS ,CHAVAKKAD DATED 03-07-2019
CRIME NO.441/2019 OF Vadanappally Police Station , Thrissur
PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.3:
SAJEEVU
AGED 42 YEARS
S/O. CHANDRASEKHARAN,
PATTATH HOUSE, 10TH STONE DESOM,
THALIKKULAM VILLAGE, CHAVAKKAD,
THRISSUR DISTRICT
BY ADVS.
SRI.P.K.VARGHESE
SMT.S.SEETHA
RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT:
THE STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KERALA,
ERNAKULAM - 682031
SMT.V.SREEJA,PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
10.07.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
-2-
Bail Appl..No.4955 of 2019
ORDER
The petitioner is the third accused in Crime No.441/2019 of Vadanappilly Police Station registered for the offence punishable under Section 353 read with Section 34 IPC.
2. The petitioner was arrested on 01.07.2019 and ever since he has been in custody.
3. Heard.
4. The learned Public Prosecutor has submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It appears that the major part of the investigation as regards the petitioner is almost complete. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, including the fact that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. In the result, this application stands allowed and -3- Bail Appl..No.4955 of 2019 the petitioner shall be enlarged on bail, on condition of the petitioner executing a bond for Rs.30,000/- (Rupees thirty thousand only), with two solvent sureties, each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the Jurisdictional Magistrate and subject to the following further conditions:-
1. The petitioner shall report before the Investigating Officer as and when required by the Investigating Officer for interrogation.
2. The petitioner shall not intimidate or influence the witnesses or in any way tamper with the investigation.
3. The petitioner shall not get involved in any other offence during the pendency of this case.
Sd/-
B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR JUDGE Nkr/10.07.19