Delhi District Court
Matrix Cellular (International) ... vs Nisar Ahmed on 21 December, 2012
IN THE COURT OF SHRI RAJ KUMAR TRIPATHI,
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE (SOUTH),
SAKET COURTS, NEW DELHI.
CS No. 190/2012
Unique Case ID No. 02406C0243642012
Matrix Cellular (International) Services Pvt. Ltd.,
07, Khullar Farms, 140, New Manglapuri,
Mandi Road, Mehrauli, New Delhi 110 030.
Plaintiff
Versus
Nisar Ahmed
S/o Abdul Jabbar
R/o D209, Sarita Vihar,
New Delhi 110076
Defendant
DATE OF INSTITUTION : 28.09.2012
DATE OF RESERVING JUDGMENT : Not reserved
DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 21.12.2012
SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF A SUM OF Rs. 10,621/ (RUPEES
TEN THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED & TWENTY ONE ONLY)
UNDER ORDER XXXVII CPC.
JUDGMENT
1. This is a suit filed Under Order XXXVII of The Code of Civil Procedure (in short "CPC") by plaintiff company for recovery of a liquidated sum of Rs. 10,621/ along with interest. After the summons CS No. 190/2012 Page No. 1 of 5 of the suit were issued to defendant in the prescribed form as defined under Order 37 (2) (Sub Rule 2) CPC, defendant has not entered his appearance.
2. Defendant remained absent despite service of summons upon him at his address at D 209, Sarita Vihar, New Delhi 110076
3. I have heard learned counsel for plaintiff at considerable length and have perused the record.
4. The plaintiff is a Private Limited company registered under The Companies Act, 1956 and dealing in International Mobile Rental Services having its registered office at 07, Khullar Farms, 140, New Manglapuri, Mandi Road, Mehrauli, New Delhi 110 030. The suit is instituted through Shri Chandra Shekhar, Executive, legal who has been authorized vide board resolution dated 27.1.2011 to sign and verify all pleadings on behalf of plaintiff company. It is stated that defendant had applied for International Mobile Connection in South Delhi and procured the Standard Application form containing the terms & conditions regarding the usage of connection. The defendant categorically signed a statement that he has read and understood the terms & conditions of the Agreement Form dated 24.04.2010 and agreed to abide by him. On the basis of the information/statement furnished by the defendant in the Application Form, the plaintiff gave CS No. 190/2012 Page No. 2 of 5 him International Mobile connection No.07942851057 under the Agreement No. M1004852. As per the accounts maintained by plaintiff company, an outstanding amount of Rs.10,621/ is due and payable by the defendant towards the International Mobile Connection No. 07942851057. The plaintiff company raised invoices on the defendant. The defendant paid an amount of Rs. 5,000/ as a security by way of cash and same was adjusted on 01.05.2010 by plaintiff company. Despite repeated reminders and requests, the defendant intentionally and deliberately failed to pay the same with ulterior motives. The suit is based on Agreement Form, which is placed on record in original by plaintiff hence the same is covered within the provisions of Order XXXVII CPC and is also tendered within limitation.
5. There is no relief claimed by plaintiff which does not fall within the ambit of the provisions of Order XXXVII CPC.
6. It is useful to refer the relevant provisions of law which are as under: Order XXXVII Rule 3(1) CPC.
(1) In a suit to which this Order applies, the plaintiff shall, together with the summons under rule 2, serve on the defendant a copy of the plaint and annexures thereto and the defendant may, at any time within ten days of such services, enter an appearance either in person or by pleader and, in CS No. 190/2012 Page No. 3 of 5 either case, he shall file in court an address for service of notice on him.
Order XXXVII Rule 2(3) CPC.
(3) The defendant shall not defend the suit referred to in sub rule(1) unless he enters an appearance and in default of his entering an appearance the allegations in the plaint shall be deemed to be admitted and the plaintiff shall be entitled to a decree for any sum, not exceeding the sum mentioned in the summons, together with interest at the rate specified, if any, up to the date of the decree and such sum for costs as may be determined by the Hon'ble High Court from time to time by rules made in that behalf and such decree may be executed forthwith.
7. In view of the above mentioned provisions of law, it is clear that if the defendant makes default in entering his appearance within ten days from the date of service of summons upon him, the allegations as levelled in the plaint shall be deemed to be admitted and the plaintiff shall be entitled to a decree. As per record, the defendant stood served with the summons of the suit in prescribed proforma on 17.11.2012. Till date, no appearance has been entered into by the defendant and accordingly the allegations levelled in the plaint are deemed to be admitted by him, entitling the plaintiff to a decree straightway.
8. The plaintiff has placed on record the original agreement form, tariff plans; account ledger of the defendant, itemized bills, legal CS No. 190/2012 Page No. 4 of 5 notice dated 12.03.2012, copy of passport and visa of defendant given to plaintiff for reimbursement of the usage of the mobile number. From the documents placed on record by the plaintiff shows that a written contract was executed between the parties. The defendant availed the services of the plaintiff and undertook to make payment of the same. The defendant failed to make payment despite using the services of the plaintiff. The account of ledger of defendant shows that the defendant is liable to pay a sum of Rs.10,621.17 for using the services of the plaintiff.
9. Hence, in the given circumstances, suit of the plaintiff is decreed with cost against defendant. Defendant is directed to pay a sum of Rs. 10,621/ to the plaintiff with interest @ 8% per annum from the date of filing of the suit till its realization. Decreesheet be prepared. File be consigned to record room.
(Announced in open Court (RAJ KUMAR TRIPATHI)
on 21.12.2012) Senior Civil Judge (South)
Saket Courts, New Delhi.
CS No. 190/2012 Page No. 5 of 5