Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Delhi District Court

Sh. Ankit Sharma vs Sh. Rampal on 9 March, 2017

                          IN THE COURT OF SH. ARUN BHARDWAJ:
                        PO MACT(SE-01), SAKET COURTS: NEW DELHI

          Suit No. 4077/16
          FIR No. 833/14
          PS : Sarita Vihar
          U/s 279/338 IPC

          Sh. Ankit Sharma
          S/o Sh. Vivekanand Sharma
          R/o H.No. B-18, Gali No. 16 F,
          Molarband Extn., Badarpur
          New Delhi                                                         ... Claimant

                                               Versus
          1. Sh. Rampal
             S/o Sh. Tigava
             R/o Villa Kararia,
             Distt. Mahua, U.P          ...(R1, Driver of vehicle No. HR-55 Q 2414)

          2. Sh. Sudhir Kumar
             S/o Sh. Rajinder Kumar
             R/o Village Mevala Bhatle
             Distt. Ghaziabad, U.P.
                                 ...(R2, Owner of vehicle No. HR-55 Q 2414)

          3. HDFC General Insurance company Ltd.
             1st Floor, D-1, M.G. Tower, RDC,
             Raj Nagar, Ghaziabad (U.P)
                                    ...(R3, Insurer of vehicle No. HR-55 Q 2414)


Date of DAR                     :      19.02.2015
Date of Decision                :      09.03.2017

                                       AWARD


     1. Detailed accident report proceeding has been filed in respect of FIR No.
          833/14, registered at PS Sarita Vihar, under Section 279/338 of IPC and
          it was reported that Sh. Ankit Sharma has received injuries in a road
          traffic   accident   which   took   place   on   28.11.2014   involving   vehicle   no.


Suit No. 4077/16                Sh. Ankit Sharma Vs. Sh. Rampal & Ors.                 Page No. 1 of 5
           HR­55­Q­2414. The plea of injured / claimant is that the accident took
          place due to rash and negligent driving by the respondent / driver while

driving the offending vehicle no.  HR­55­Q­2414 at the time of accident. 

2. In conciliation, matter has been settled between the parties for a sum of Rs. 5,50,000/­ (Rupees five lacs and fifty thousand only) payable by R3, the insurance company to the claimant towards full and final settlement of claims.  

3. Statement of parties to this regard recorded separately. 

4. In   view   of   the   statements,   the   matter   is   disposed   off   passing   a settlement award for a sum of Rs. 5,50,000/­ (Rupees five lacs and fifty thousand only) payable by R3, the insurance company to the claimant towards full  and final settlement of claims within 30 days from today failing which it shall be payable with interest @ 9% from the date of filing of DAR which is 19.02.2015 till realization.   

5. The compensation would be deposited within 30 days with the State Bank of India, Saket Court Branch under intimation to the claimants as well as to their counsel at following address :-

Sh. Manoranjan Gaur Chamber No. 584, Lawyers Block, Saket Courts Complex, New Delhi- 110017

6. When financial needs of the claimants were inquired, the claimant had informed that he has no objection if the compensation awarded to him be placed in FDRs with a monthly provision of Rs. 7,500/- and some amount be released to him immediately.

7. The State Bank of India, Saket court branch will keep this Suit No. 4077/16              Sh. Ankit Sharma Vs. Sh. Rampal & Ors.             Page No. 2 of 5 compensation in 70 FDRs of Rs. 7,500 /- each for a period of 1 to 70 months with cumulative interest and the remaining amount of Rs. 25,000/- shall be released to the claimant immediately. The maturity amount of each FDR shall be credited in the saving bank account of the claimant.

8. The   particulars   of   Form­IV   of   the   Modified   Claims   Tribunal   Agreed Procedure are as under: 

1. Date of the accident 03.12.2014
2. Date of intimation of the accident by  05.12.2014 the Investigating Officer to the Claims  Tribunal. (Clause 2)
3. Date of intimation of the accident by  Not Available  the Investigation Officer to the  Insurance Company. (Clause 2)
4. Date of filing of Report under Section  Not available  173 Cr.P.C. before the Metropolitan  Magistrate. (Clause 10)
5. Date of filing of Detailed Accident  19.02.2015 Information Report (DAR) by the  Investigating Officer before Claims  Tribunal. (Clause 10)
6. Date of service of DAR on the  19.02.2015 Insurance Company. (Clause 11)
7. Date of service of DAR on the  19.02.2015 claimant(s). (Clause 11)
8. Whether DAR was complete in all  Yes respects? (Clause 16)
9. If not, state deficiencies in the DAR Not Applicable. 
10. Whether the police has verified the  Yes documents filed with DAR? (Clause 4)
11. Whether there was any delay or  Yes.   The   DAR   was   not deficiency on the part of the  filed   within   30   days.

Investigating Officer? If so, whether  However,   as   the   filing   of Suit No. 4077/16              Sh. Ankit Sharma Vs. Sh. Rampal & Ors.             Page No. 3 of 5 any action / direction warranted. DAR   was   extended   from time   to   time,   no   action   / direction is warranted.  

12. Date of appointment of the Designated  Not Available. 

Officer by the Insurance Company. 

(Clause19

13. Name, address and contact number of  Not Available. 

the Designated Officer of the Insurance Company. (Clause 19)

14. Whether the Designated Officer of the  No.  Legal  offer  was  filed Insurance Company submitted his  on   24.07.2015   but   the report within 30 days of the DAR?  DAR   was   filed   on (Clause 21) 19.02.2015. 

15. Whether the Insurance Company  Yes. 

admitted the liability?, if so, whether  the Designated Officer of the Insurance Company fairly computed the  compensation in accordance with law  (Clause 92). 

16. Whether, there was any delay or  No. deficiency on the part of the  Designated Officer of the Insurance  Company? If so, whether any action /  direction warranted?

17. Date of response of the claimants to  09.03.2017 the offer of the Insurance Company. 

(Clause 23)

18. Date of award. 09.03.2017

19. Whether the award was passed with  Yes  the consent of the parties? (Clause 22)

20. Whether the claimants examined at the Yes,   Claimant   requested time of passing of the award to  to   release   some   amount ascertain his / their financial condition?  of   the   compensation (Clause 26). immediately   and   rest   in FDRs.

Suit No. 4077/16              Sh. Ankit Sharma Vs. Sh. Rampal & Ors.             Page No. 4 of 5

21. Whether the photographs, specimen  He   is   directed   to   file   the signatures, proof of residence and  same within 4 weeks.  particulars of bank account of the  injured / legal hairs of the deceased  taken at the time of passing of the  award? (Clause 96)

22. Mode of disbursement of the award  By   way   of   FDRs   in   SBI, amount to the claimant (Clause 28)  Saket   Courts   Complex.

            next date of compliance of the award.             The date of compliance is
            (Clause 30)                                       fixed.  


9. Copy of this award be given to the parties free of cost and a copy of award be also sent to DLSA, South East, Delhi as well as to the Ld. Metropolitan Magistrate concerned.

10. List for compliance on 10.04.2017.  

Announced in open Court (ARUN BHARDWAJ) on 09th March, 2017 PO-MACT-01 (South-East) Saket Court/ New Delhi(sk) Suit No. 4077/16              Sh. Ankit Sharma Vs. Sh. Rampal & Ors.             Page No. 5 of 5