Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Patna High Court - Orders

Shri Parmanand Bhagat @ Parmanand ... vs Santmat Satsang Nyas Board & Anr on 5 May, 2016

Author: Mungeshwar Sahoo

Bench: Mungeshwar Sahoo

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                 Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10743 of 2015
                   ======================================================
                   1. Shri Parmanand Bhagat @ Parmanand Prasad, S/o late Banwari Lal
                   Bhagat, resident of Mohalla- Babuaganj, Prakash Takies Road, P.S. and
                   District- Khagaria.

                                                                          .... .... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                   1. Santmat Satsang Nyas Board, Khagaria through Swami Banarsi Yogarthi
                   S/o Sri Ishwar Prasad Singh, village and Post Pasraha, P.S. Pasraha, District
                   Khagaria, at present resident of Kali Bari Khagaria.
                   2. Sri Ishwar Chand Bhagat S/o Shri Parmanand Bhagt, resident of Mohalla
                   Babuganj Prakash Takies Road, P.s. and District- Khagaria.

                                                                    .... .... Respondent/s
                   ======================================================
                   Appearance :
                   For the Petitioner/s :   Mr. Jagdish Prasad Bhagat
                   For the Respondent/s   : Mr.
                   ======================================================
                   CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MUNGESHWAR
                   SAHOO
                   ORAL ORDER

3     05-05-2016

After some arguments learned counsel Mr. J.P. Bhagat submitted that in view of the Order 8 Rule 6(A) sub Rule 4 CPC. The counter claim is to be treated as plaint and when by the impugned order the counter claim which is a deemed plaint has been rejected. It is a decree within the meaning of the said turn defined under Section 2 sub Rule 2 CPC therefore appeal shall be filed by the petitioner and accordingly he seeks permission to withdraw this writ application with liberty to file appeal before appropriate forum.

In view of the submission of the writ petitioner is permitted to withdraw this writ application which aforesaid liberty.

Thus, this writ application is dismissed with aforesaid liberty.

(Mungeshwar Sahoo, J) siddharth/-

U