Patna High Court
Manoj Kumar Rajjak @ Manoj Rajjak vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 27 August, 2018
Author: Anil Kumar Upadhyay
Bench: Anil Kumar Upadhyay
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8262 of 2012
===========================================================
Manoj Kumar Rajjak @ Manoj Rajjak, S/O Sri Laxmi Rajjak, R/O Village-
Sindhiya Diwanganj, P.S.- Sadar, District- Purnea
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Human Resources Department,
Bihar, Patna
2. The Collector, Purnea
3. The District Superintendent of Education, Purnea
4. Block Education Extension Officer, Sadar East Purnea
5. Block Education Officer, Sadar East Purnea
6. Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj, Dimiyan Chhattarjan Sadar East, Purnea
7. Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj, Dimiyan Chhattarjan, Sadar East Purnea
8. Headmaster, Primary School, Srinagar, Bilriya Sadar East, Purnea
.... .... Respondent/s
===========================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar Mallick, Advocate
For the Respondent/s : Mrs. Shail Kumari, SC15
===========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY
ORAL JUDGMENT
Date: 27-08-2018 This case was listed on different dates under the heading "For Admission", but unfortunately no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner.
2. From order dated 30.04.2012, it appears that this case was directed to be listed after disposal of L.P.A. No. 1569 of 2010.
3. L.P.A. No. 1569 of 2010 was referred to the Full Bench and thereafter the Full Bench of this Court disposed of L.P.A. No. 1569 of 2010 (Kalpana Rani vs. State of Bihar & Ors.) and held out that the post of Shiksha Mitra is now a closed chapter and as such Patna High Court CWJC No.8262 of 2012 dt.27-08-2018 2/2 no relief can be granted to the appellant for appointment on the post of Shiksha Mitra.
4. In view of the judgment of the Full Bench in the case of Kalpana Rani vs. State of Bihar & Ors., reported in 2014 (2) PLJR 665, the Court does not find any merit in the writ application. Accordingly, the same is dismissed.
(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Uday/-
AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 28.08.2018 Transmission Date