Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 9, Cited by 0]

Jharkhand High Court

Bhuneshwari Devi Alias Ganeshwari Devi vs The State Of Jharkhand on 15 September, 2017

1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI B.A. No. 4349 of 2017             ­­­       Bhuneshwari   Devi   @   Ganeshwari   Devi,   W/o   Ramesh   Lohra,  Resident of Village:Larango, P.O.&P.S.­Sisai, Dist.­Gumla   .... Petitioner           ­­Versus­­    The State of Jharkhand     .... Opposite Party          ­­­    CORAM :   HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR ­­­ For the Petitioner :  Mrs. Vani Kumari, Advocate    For the State :  Mr.Ram Prakash Singh, APP      ­­­         4/ 15.09.2017 Counter­affidavit taken on record.

Heard the learned counsels appearing for the parties and  perused the documents on record. 

The petitioner has been made accused in AHTU Gurdari  Gumla   P.S.Case   No.24/2016   corresponding   to   G.R.No.383/2016  [S.T.No.352/2016] registered under sections 363365367368370371 IPC, sections 23/26 of J.J. Act, sections 16/18 Bonded  Labour   Prohibition   Act   and   under   sections   25/26   of   Inter­State  Migrant   Workmen   (Regulation   of   Employment   and   Condition   of  Service) Act.

Contending that in S.T. No.237/2016 when the victim girl  was   examined   she   was   declared   hostile   by   the   prosecution,   the  learned   counsel   for   the   petitioner   submits   that   order  dated   27.04.2017   in   S.T.  Case  No.352/2016  by  which   prayer   for  bail on behalf of the petitioner was rejected would disclose that on  an incorrect assumption of fact, that the victim girls have not been  recovered from the possession of the petitioner, the bail application  was rejected.   On the allegation that the petitioner sold the victim  girls,   the   learned   counsel   for   the   petitioner   submits   that   on  admitted facts, it would appear that the victim girls on their own  accompanied   the   petitioner.   The   petitioner   is   in   judicial   custody  since 26.08.2016 along with her two children.   

The learned APP has opposed the prayer for grant of bail. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case,  the   petitioner,   namely,   Bhuneshwari   Devi   @   Ganeshwari   Devi,   is  2. directed   to   be   released   on  bail,  on   furnishing   bail   bond   of  Rs.10,000/­   (Rupees   ten   thousand)   with   two   sureties   of   the   like  amount each to the satisfaction of  learned District and Additional  Sessions Judge­I, Gumla in connection with AHTU Gurdari Gumla  P.S.Case   No.24/2016   corresponding   to   G.R.No.383/2016  [S.T.No.352/2016].  

This application is allowed. Let a copy of this order be  sent to the trial court through FAX.       

  

           (Shree Chandrashekhar, J.) SI/ ,