Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Krushna S/O. Chandrakant Ghule And 3 ... vs The State Of Mah. Thr. Its Pso, Ps ... on 30 January, 2024

Author: Vinay Joshi

Bench: Vinay Joshi

                                               1/2                          904.wp99.2024

              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                        NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR

                 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 99 OF 2024
                      Krushna S/o Chandrakant Ghule and Ors.
                                          Vs.
    State of Maharashtra, Thru. Its PSO, PS Malkapur City, Tah. Malkapur, District -
                                   Buldhana and anr.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Office notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders                                Court's or Judge's Orders.
or directions and Registrar's orders.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                           Mr. Ram Karode, Advocate a/w Mr. Abhijit Ghule,
                           Advocate for petitioners.
                           Mrs. S.V. Kolhe, APP for respondent Nos.1 & 2.

                                        CORAM          : VINAY JOSHI, AND
                                                        SMT.VRUSHALI V.JOSHI, JJ.
                                        DATE           : 30.01.2024


                                        Heard.

2. In pursuance of FIR registered against some other persons, the petitioners have received a notice dated 16.01.2024 issued in terms of Section 91 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. By said communication, the petitioners are directed to deposit certain sum which is alleged to be relating to the FIR registered against a third party.

3. Prima facie, we are not satisfied that as to how the powers under Section 91 would authorize Prity 2/2 904.wp99.2024 Police Officer to issue such a directions. Section 91 is to be invoked for summoning production of documents or other things, obviously in the nature of documents or material but not money.

4. Issue notice to the respondents, returnable on 20.02.2024.

5. Mrs. S.V. Kolhe, learned APP waives service of notice on behalf of respondent Nos.1 & 2.

6. In the meantime, there shall be stay to the impugned communication dated 16.01.2024.

7. We made it clear that Investigating Officer is at liberty to invoke appropriate action for redressal as permissible under law.

                                              JUDGE                         JUDGE




Signed by: Mrs. PrityPrity
                      Gabhane

Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 31/01/2024 12:59:28