Supreme Court - Daily Orders
Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central) ... vs Dilbagh Rai Arora on 14 July, 2017
Bench: Rohinton Fali Nariman, Sanjay Kishan Kaul
1
ITEM NO.54 COURT NO.13 SECTION XI
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 26173/2011
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 15-09-2010
in ITA No. 125/2009 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At
Allahabad)
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) KANPUR Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
DILBAGH RAI ARORA Respondent(s)
WITH
SLP(C) No. 62/2012 (XI)
SLP(C) No. 28796/2011 (XI)
SLP(C) No. 28126/2011 (XI)
SLP(C) No. 26175/2011 (XI)
SLP(C) No. 33050/2011 (XI)
SLP(C) No. 28799/2011 (XI)
SLP(C) No. 1066/2014 (XI)
SLP(C) No. 30716/2011 (XI)
SLP(C) No. 28797/2011 (XI)
SLP(C) No. 28798/2011 (XI)
SLP(C) No. 61/2012 (XI)
SLP(C) No. 30714/2011 (XI)
SLP(C) No. 17877/2014 (XI)
Date : 14-07-2017 These petitions were called on for hearing
today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
For Petitioner(s) Mrs. Anil Katiyar, AOR (N.P.)
For Respondent(s) Mr. Sanjay Jhanwar, Adv.
Mr. Rajat Sharma, Adv.
Mr. Tarun Gupta, AOR
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
Signature Not Verified Delay condoned.
Digitally signed byR.NATARAJAN Date: 2017.07.17 16:48:04 IST Reason: No one appears even on second call on behalf of the petitioner.
2We have gone through the paper books and find no merit in these Special Leave Petitions for the reasons stated by the High Court. In any case, these Special Leave Petitions do not raise any general question of law applicable to all but is confined only to the facts of individual assessees, namely, the respondents. We see no ground to interfere with the impugned order of the High Court.
The Special Leave Petitions are dismissed on merits. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.
(R. NATARAJAN) (SAROJ KUMARI GAUR) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER