Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 1]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Dharam Singh Thind vs Pspcl And Anr on 9 March, 2018

Author: Jaspal Singh

Bench: Jaspal Singh

CWP No. 5792 OF 2018                                                   --1--


           IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
                         AT CHANDIGARH

                                         CWP No. 5792 OF 2018
                                         DECIDED ON: MARCH 09, 2018


DHARAM SINGH THIND                                            .....PETITIONER

                                     VERSUS


PUNJAB STATE POWER CORP. LTD                                 .....RESPONDENTS
AND OTHERS


CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASPAL SINGH

Present:   Mr. Kanwaljeet Singh, Advocate
           for the petitioner.

           *****

JASPAL SINGH, J.

By virtue of instant petition preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner has sought issuance of a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents to grant the benefit of 23 year advance promotional increments as per principal policy under Finance Circulars 17/1990 dated 23.04.1990 amended from time to time, with consequential re-fixation of pay and retiral benefits and to release the arrears of revised pay and retiral benefits along with interest @ 12% p.a.

2. At the very outset of the arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners submits petitioner feels satisfied in case direction is issued to respondent(s) to decide legal notice dated 27.02.2017 (Annexure P-5), within a stipulated period.

3. Instant petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.1-


                                        1 of 2
                     ::: Downloaded on - 11-03-2018 08:15:42 :::
 CWP No. 5792 OF 2018                                                     --2--


Chairman-cum-Managing        Director,         Punjab   State    Power   Corporation

Ltd/PSPCL, Patiala to look into the grievances unfolded by the petitioner in legal notice dated 27.02.2017 (Annexure P-5) and to decide the same as per circulars 17/1990 dated 23.04.1990 amended from time to time, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. However, relief shall stand restricted to 38 months in view of Full Bench judgment of this Court in "Saroj Kumari v. State of Punjab and others", 1998(3) SCT 664.

4. However, if the petitioner still feels aggrieved against the order passed by the concerned authority, he shall be at liberty to have recourse to the other remedies as well as to approach this Court.

MARCH 09, 2018                                            (JASPAL SINGH)
sonika                                                        JUDGE

Whether speaking/reasoned       Yes

Whether reportable              Yes/No




                                      2 of 2
                   ::: Downloaded on - 11-03-2018 08:15:43 :::