Canara Bank vs Piyush Tripathi on 29 September, 2021

[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

Canara Bank vs Piyush Tripathi on 29 September, 2021

                                         ADDITIONAL BENCH
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,
           PUNJAB, CHANDIGARH.

                      First Appeal No.745 of 2019

                              Date of institution : 19.11.2019
                              Reserved On         : 21.09.2021
                              Date of decision : 29.09.2021

Canara Bank, Credit Section for Education Loan, J.C. Road,
Bangalore, being the Nodal Officer.

                                     .....Appellant/Opposite Party No.4
                              Versus

1.

Piyush Tripathi S/o Sh. Surinder Tripathi, R/o House No.501, Vikas Nagar, opposite Model Town, Saloh Road, Nawanshahr, District SBS Nagar (Punjab).

2. Surinder Tripathi S/o Sh. Prem Nath Sharma, R/o # 501, Vikas Nagar, opposite Model Town, Saloh Road, Nawanshahr, District S.B.S. Nagar (Punjab).

....Respondents/Complainants

3. Union Bank of India, Branch Doaba Aryan Senior Secondary, K.C. Market, Rahon Road, Nawanshahr, District S.B.S. Nagar (Punjab), through its Branch Manager.

4. Union Bank of India, Regional Office, Veer Pratap Bhawan, Shashtri Market, Nehru Garden Road, Jalandhar (Punjab), through its Regional Manager.

5. Union Bank of India, Head Office at Union Bank Bhavan, 239, Vidhan Bhawan Marg, Nariman Point, Mumbai, Maharashtra, through its Chairman.

.....Respondents/Opposite Parties No.1 to 3

First Appeal against the order dated 09.10.2019 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum (now, First Appeal No.745 of 2019 2 "Commission") Shaheed Bhagat Singh Nagar.

Quorum:-

Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Daya Chaudhary, President Mr. Rajinder Kumar Goyal, Member Mrs. Kiran Sibal, Member.

1) Whether Reporters of the Newspapers may be allowed to see the Judgment? Yes/No

2) To be referred to the Reporters or not? Yes/No

3) Whether judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes/No Argued By:-

For the appellant : Sh. Nitin Gupta, Advocate For respondents No.1 & 2 : Sh. Nitin Thatai, Advocate For respondents No.3 to 5 : Sh. Anirudh Gupta, Advocate.

JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY, PRESIDENT For order, see First Appeal No.180 of 2020 (Union Bank of India & Ors. v. Piyush Tripathi & Ors.).

(JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY) PRESIDENT (RAJINDER KUMAR GOYAL) MEMBER (KIRAN SIBAL) MEMBER September 29, 2021.

(Gurmeet S)

Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

Canara Bank vs Piyush Tripathi on 29 September, 2021