Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Gauhati High Court

Google India Pvt Ltd vs The State Of Assam And Anr on 21 December, 2022

Author: Malasri Nandi

Bench: Malasri Nandi

                                                                     Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010263592022




                           THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
  (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                              Case No. : Crl.Pet./1304/2022

             GOOGLE INDIA PVT LTD
             NO. 3, RMZ INFINITY -TOWER E, OLD MADRAS ROAD, 4TH AND 5TH
             FLOORS, BANGALORE KA 560016, REP. BY GITANJALI DUGGAL, AGED
             ABOUT 50 YEARS, DAUGHTER OF LATE V. P. DR. DUGGAL, R/O D-32,
             SECOND FLOR, PANCHASEEL, ENCLAVE, NEW DELHI-110017
             AUTHORISED SIGNATORY.

             VERSUS

             THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR
             REP. BY THE LD. PP, ASSAM

             2:SRI PRAMOD BORO
              S/O LATE GHANASHYAM BORO
             VILL- SAURAGURI
             P.O. KACHUBARI
             P.S. TAMULPUR
             DIST. BAKSA, BTAD, ASSA

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. K N CHOUDHURY
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM

                                   BEFORE
                      HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MALASRI NANDI

                                        ORDER

21-12-2022 This is an application, under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., for setting aside and quashing of the C.R. Case No. 34/2020 and the orders dated 13-08-2020, 27- 09-2021 and 08-12-2022, passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kokrajhar.

Page No.# 2/2 Heard Mr. K.N. Choudhury, learned senior counsel, assisted by Mr. N. Gautam, learned counsel as well as Mr. Sidharth Luthra, learned senior counsel, assisted by Mr. Rangon Choudhury, learned counsel representing the petitioner. Also heard Mr. B. Sarma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor representing the State respondent No. 1.

It is submitted by the learned senior counsel for the petitioner that vide order dated 06-12-2022, passed in Crl. Pet. No. 1233/2022, this Court has stayed further proceedings against the accused No. 1 in C.R. Case No. 34/2020, pending before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kokrajhar. It is submitted that similar direction may also be issued in this criminal petition against the present petitioner as accused No. 2 in the same complaint petition. It has also been submitted that the petitioner does not represent Google India Pvt. Ltd. as alleged. More so, the Magistrate did not follow the provisions of law under Section 202 Cr.P.C. before issuing process to the petitioner. I have considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner. Accordingly, issue notice.

Steps be taken for service of notice on respondent No. 2 by registered post with A/D Card as well as by usual process within a week from today. List the matter on 20-01-2023.

In the interim it is directed that all further proceeding of C.R. Case No. 34/2020, pending before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kokrajhar, so far as the petitioner is concerned, shall remain stayed.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant