Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

M/S. Quixotic Healthcare And Others vs The State Of Maharashtra And Anr on 2 July, 2019

Author: V.L. Achliya

Bench: V.L. Achliya

                                                                                 Cr.WP 878/19

                                                    -   1 -

                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                              BENCH AT AURANGABAD

934 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.878 OF 2019

M/S. QUIXOTIC HEALTHCARE AND OTHERS
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
...
Advocate for Petitioners : Smt.Rashmi Kulkarni h/f Shri
Kulkarni Sanket S.
APP for Respondents: Shri A.P. Basarkar

                                                   CORAM: V.L. ACHLIYA, J.

                                                   DATE:    02.07.2019
PER COURT :


1]               The        petitioners             have      filed          this         petition

challenging             the         order    of    issuance         of     process          with       a

consequential                relief          to     quash       and        set       aside         the

proceedings challenged by way of this petition.

2]               In      brief,         it    is     the    contention              of      learned

counsel for the petitioners that while passing the order

of issuance of process, the learned Magistrate has failed

to take into account the mandatory requirement of law as

provided u/s 25(4) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act.                                             It is

submitted that the complaint was filed when the drug was

due for expiry.                     Despite request made to refer the fourth

sample of drug to Central Laboratory for analysis, it was

not      referred           by       the     concerned      authority             and       thereby



     ::: Uploaded on - 03/07/2019                             ::: Downloaded on - 04/07/2019 03:35:56 :::
                                                                             Cr.WP 878/19

                                               -   2 -

defeated the statutory right of the petitioners.

3]               Considering the submissions advanced, I am of

the      view        that      the   matter    requires         due      consideration.

Hence, I pass the following order.

                                        O R D E R

A] Issue notice to respondents returnable on 29.7.2019.

B] Learned APP accepts the notice for the respondent nos.1 & 2.

C] The trial Court is directed to defer the hearing of the case till 29.7.2019.

(V.L. ACHLIYA, J.) ndk/c27195.doc ::: Uploaded on - 03/07/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 04/07/2019 03:35:56 :::